Defence open source sold by commerce, not ideals

 
Page 1 of 2 | Single page

Fanaticism doing the industry no favours.

Open source software companies haven't done a very good job pitching the technology to the defence sector, according to IT consultant Tom Worthington.

Worthington, who was a senior IT officer at the Department of Defence for nine years from 1990, said the industry wrongly believed that the department frowned upon open source.

While open source policy may not be as well defined in the Australian defence sector as it is in the U.S., "the Australian Government isn't adverse to open source," he explained, pointing to its 2005 'Guide to Open Source Software'.

Rather than policy, the greatest hurdle for open source sales was poor communication between the industry and government, he said.

"They [open source vendors] haven't done a very good job," Worthington told iTnews.

"Defence [staff] are not wanting to be converted to a religious cause; [vendors] need to talk the commercial language and work within the way the bureaucracy does things."

When he was working at the Department of Defence, Worthington was approached by open source software developers seeking funding for a new project.

He was interested in the product and said the department would pay for it if the developers could ship him a copy -- but the developers refused, saying it was freely available online.

"In part, it is an ideology; it's very similar to the idea of research at universities, where somebody pays for it but the results are for the common good," said Worthington, who also lectures at the Australian National University.

Instead of selling open source as a concept, Worthington said vendors should focus on selling software and systems that may or may not rely on open source technology.

Justin Freeman, director of Canberra-based software vendor Agileware, agreed that businesses should approach bureaucratic Defence customers from a more commercial perspective.

Agileware was founded in 2002 and sells open source systems and services to private and public sector organisations, including those in the defence sector.

"Open source is a little confusing for them," Freeman said, explaining that government organisations were used to either completely owning intellectual property (IP) or being under restrictive licensing agreements.

"The challenge is IP and understanding what it means to adopt open source software and what they are permitted to do within the bounds of the license," he told iTnews.

SMEs like Agileware were unlikely to spark major infrastructure changes in the Australian defence sector, Freeman said, highlighting better opportunities in leveraging existing platforms and "riding the coattails of businesses like Red Hat, IBM or Oracle".

But "there's no silver bullet," he said. "You've got to come at it on a case-by-case basis and sometimes you win, sometimes you lose."

Read on for a few tips for selling open source to the defence sector.


Defence open source sold by commerce, not ideals
"There are so many things wrong with this article I don’t know where to begin. On a simple level you are endorsing a solution before you even know the problem. Then to quote Monty Python and the ..."
By grumpybug
 
 
 
Comments: 2
Liz Tay
Apr 16, 2010 5:12 PM
Re: Tip #2 --
Justin Freeman has pointed out that web apps powered by open source software make selling user-facing systems possible and user acceptable.

Edited by Liz Tay: 16/4/2010 05:16:05 PM
grumpybug
Apr 17, 2010 8:50 AM
There are so many things wrong with this article I don’t know where to begin.

On a simple level you are endorsing a solution before you even know the problem.

Then to quote Monty Python and the Holy Grail “Tell them we’ve already got one”, chances are Defence already has a solution but by targeting individual stakeholders your setting up stove pipes and these people won’t be aware of the bigger picture. The problem is that any vendor (and this is not just open source) gets the stakeholder all excited about their product and sets the expectation that it’s going to solve world hunger, then it’s up to the good folk at CIOG to say sorry but we already have something that meets 80 -90% of that functionality and we are not going to duplicate that functionality just for you. Currently the system at Defence is so clogged up with these types of requests that it makes it hard to actually work on any sort of reform to the system. I would argue that the system is not bureaucratic, it’s just full of frivolous requests from people who aren’t focused on the enterprise.

Then you have the issue of standards, Ok, you accept an open source system into the enterprise, let’s say it has a MySQL database. Well that’s fine but then Developer number 2 comes along “ Oh but my system needs Postgres”, then we have Firebird, SQLite, etc, etc, etc. Suddenly I’m supporting 15 databases, all requiring patching and how does that help me with server consolidation. Sure I can virtualise but that’s still a server I need to maintain. Then we could standardise on say “MySQL”, but not all open source systems will work with MySQL so they will need to be customized, so you then have a customized fork of the open source system, who’s going to support that?

I would agree though with point 2. Just don’t have the expectation that if it is a mobile device that it will be connected to the network anytime soon.

My advice would be to engage with CIOG first and find out what is possible before you even start. Of course finding the right person in CIOG is a challenge itself so good luck with that.

I could go on at this stage but this only my comments not and article :-)
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote