Vividwireless owner proposes carrier license fee hike

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Pay for content classification for the internet filter.

Vividwireless' owner Wireless Broadband Australia (WBA) has suggested that ISPs bear the cost of determining whether online content should be refused classification in Australia via a hike in their carrier license fees.

In a rare ISP submission [PDF], WBA - the parent company of ISPs vividwireless and Unwired - proposed that the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC), not the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), should classify online content referred for scrutiny by members of the public.

But there remained the question of who would ultimately foot the bill.

"For other OFLC matters, the applicant for a classification pays a classification fee," Wireless Broadband Australia said.

"For the self-regulatory areas the costs are borne by the individual broadcaster.

"Where the ACMA undertakes a regulatory function the costs are ultimately borne by telecommunications carriers through their licence fees."

The firm suggested that while "it would be possible to create an additional fund for the internet service providers (and hence users of the internet) to fund the costs of OFLC work, a simpler process administratively will be for the OFLC to charge the ACMA for its work."

"The ACMA will then recover these costs through carrier licence fees," the company said.

Informing content owners

Wireless Broadband Australia also suggested that, once content has been refused classification, that the decision be communicated to the registered owner of the domain where the content appeared.

"It should be assumed that owners of domains maintain their registrant contact details," WBA said.

"That means that a simple registry query will provide an email address to which a notification that the material has been included on the RC list can be sent.

"Any content on a domain has been ‘authorised' by the domain owner either by specifically allocating codes to allow uploading content or by maintaining a system that permits posting content."

WBA believed ISPs would favour a proposal whereby internet users attempting to reach a blocked page were informed why they could not access the content.

While recognising that "this could result in some users being motivated to get around the block using some form of proxy", it would result in less support calls made to the ISP.

And the process could be streamlined by taking affected internet users to "a standard landing page that includes details of how to seek a review of the classification decision."

Vividwireless launched its WiMAX services in Perth earlier this week. It plans to take the network into metropolitan areas nationwide.


Vividwireless owner proposes carrier license fee hike
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Xero prepares for key feature coming in 2015
Dec 19, 2014
Xero users will be able to track how their business is comparing to other Xero users.
More 4G from Optus in Darwin
Nov 21, 2014
Click to see where Optus has expanded coverage to the suburbs near Darwin.
Optus steps up regional 4G coverage
Nov 20, 2014
Once 700Mhz services are working, Optus claims regional users will have a "faster and more ...
This Huawei 4G phone costs $99
Nov 12, 2014
The $99 Huawei Ascend Y550, available through Vodafone, enters the budget market as one of the ...
4G smartphones: Microsoft's Lumia 830
Nov 7, 2014
Microsoft has announced its flagship Windows Phone, the Nokia Lumia 830 4G, will be available in ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1791

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?