Datacom data centre flooded by Melbourne storm

 

Carriers and customers hit as operator denies outage.

Datacom suffered a major outage in its Melbourne co-location facility after heavy rain broke a ceiling panel and poured into customers' equipment on Saturday afternoon.

The data centre operator's managing director Michael Browne denied there was an outage.

"There's no weight in that," he told iTnews. "The centre was not down and not ever flooded."

But his version is at odds with his own network operations centre (NOC), a series of photos sighted by iTnews and first-hand accounts from furious customers, who said the dead equipment included storage area networks, servers and routers.

"People had racks full of equipment that was dead. Some techs in there were close to tears," a national voice and data carrier who spoke on condition of anonymity said.

"We only had two servers and a router die. Others came off far worse. In some neighbouring racks, people were pouring water out of power supplies and SAN equipment."

Another customer confirmed they had been off-the-air for 13 hours and was aware of yet another customer - a business associate - with water-damaged kit.

Photos emerged showing a large hole and water-damaged ceiling above a caged area and buckets sitting on top of overhead cable trays, with customer racks clearly visible beneath.

(Photo: jason_one via Flickr).

Customers who did not suffer water damage lost power and cross-connects for up to 12 hours.

They were also unable to gain access to their racks until at least Sunday morning.

At least one customer was collecting information from others affected with a view to launching a class action against Datacom.

Mixed reports from majors

A number of major carriers and wholesalers were understood to have kit in Datacom that was affected by the outage.

An Optus spokesman confirmed to iTnews the telco rented space in Datacom and was affected by the power outage.

Wholesaler Vocus - which has a point-of-presence there - was able to work around the issue, chief executive James Spenceley said.

And AAPT - which had "a minor amount of traffic out of Datacom" - "didn't experience any notable impact to services for our customers as a result of the weather in Melbourne", a spokesman said.

They had only seen "unofficial reports" of the damage to Datacom.

NOC messages

iTnews has obtained the string of SMS outage messages sent to affected customers as the flood drama unfolded.

The first was sent on Saturday at 3.52PM titled: "Sbj: Flooding on the data floor."

At 5.28PM, network operations centre (NOC) staff told customers: "Datacom GC site has been affected by major storms. Some systems are currently shutdown until further notice, the remainder is stable."

At 6.40PM, "customers with single power supplies on DB7 (open data floor)" were advised they were affected by the flood. The "facility [was] otherwise stable", the update again said.

At 7.47PM, an update said the fault had been isolated and estimated power would resume "by midnight".

Both messages advised customers: "Do not come to site until further notice."

By 2.14AM Sunday, the situation had worsened. The site was "still experiencing issues" and the floor remained closed.

A "staged power-up" started at 3.49AM. A half-hour later, customers were told power had been restored to "99 percent of affected circuits". They were also invited to "please check your devices".

An official post-incident report did not appear to have been released. Information flows were complicated by a public holiday in Melbourne today.

At least one customer said they had been advised by NOC staff of a power surge in the facility's power distribution system.

Customers attached to newer power distribution units (PDUs) were saved by overload switches. Others were understood to have not been as lucky.

Lawsuit in the wings

Customers, including web hosts and ISPs, last night received an anonymous email seeking information from those affected for the purpose of commencing a class action.

The organiser told iTnews that parties interested in joining the suit should email datacom (dot) lawsuit (at) gmail (dot) com.

A further formal statement was requested from Datacom.

Were you impacted by the Datacom outage? Did you lose equipment? Email rcrozier (at) itnews (dot) com (au) and tell us your experience.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Datacom data centre flooded by Melbourne storm
Photo courtesy of customer.
"Datacom data centre flooded by Melbourne storm- Ry, Thought you'd move to the sports desk. CBD Data Centres nationally are a risk. Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane no different. Datacom is no ..."
By mr-internet
 
 
 
Comments: 34
BernieG
Mar 8, 2010 4:11 PM
I'm amazed at how quickly people go rushing to the courts when thing like this happen. It is not realistic for any operator to be able to guarantee that these events will not happen.

I feel sorry for the operators. Others who take co-location space should have had the building inspected independently before placing their precious equipment there.
DJ
Mar 8, 2010 4:49 PM
BernieG you are a [edit for language] who clearly has no clue.

There is no way a service provider is going to give their customers an iron-clad guarantee or certified written report for building inspection.

Whilst the operator in this case will most likely cop some form of action from disgruntled customers, it is likely that building management or maintenance contributed to the issue.

In any case, when your equipment is in somebody's care, there is an expectation that it won't be trashed due to 'bad weather'.

Edited by BrettWinterford: 9/3/2010 09:27:10 AM
packet
Mar 8, 2010 5:04 PM
TIA-942 is the standard which clearly sets out uptime objectives for four tiers of data centres. Datacom claim to provide Tier 2 and 3 service levels which require 99.749% and 99.982% availability.
Rajeeb
Mar 8, 2010 5:31 PM
We got totally trashed by this outage. The outage was one thing, I understand power outages can happen (although not for this crazy length of time) but to have your equipment electrically damaged BY the data center is totally unacceptable.

They deserve what's coming to them and should immediately set out to compensate customers instead of tell lies "that nothing happened".

TheEvilMuppet
Mar 8, 2010 9:24 PM
There are issues beyond miscommunication here.

Once connectivity was restored at about 17:10, one of my subnets was unreachable due to Datacom's network team not doing their job and ensuring all their transit providers accepted announcements for all subnets they handle. Until Datacom's Optus transit was restored, a number of subnets were unreachable.

As for BernieG, you are joking, aren't you? Do you really expect a colo to grant access to engineers as part of the pre-sale process?

And where did these photographs come from? Either they've been authorised by Datacom or they've been taken by someone in contravention of the rules you agree to upon entering the place and the person responsible is one of the reasons my staff and I now have to surrender our mobile phones at reception. If it's a case of the later, whoever's responsible is a pathetic excuse for a human being.
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 8, 2010 9:27 PM
@DJ - the operator and building management are one and the same here. Datacom has owned the entire building for a number of years now.
hsvandrew
Mar 8, 2010 9:51 PM
I agre with DJ, BernieG you clearly don't understand what a co-location data center is. If you host your equipment in your office or home, expect storms, power problems etc. If you host it in a data centre you expect as close to 100% up time as is humanly possible. This means backup power systems, security, fire alarms and something everyone takes for grants. A roof! Primus is just as bad when they had their repeated power outages.

But I guess you get what you pay for...
drawkcab
Mar 8, 2010 9:51 PM
I was one of the first customers onsite, in and out of the facility over the following 20 hours recovering ours and customer networks. As an ISP we and our customers were just as effected as the angry ranters that will sprawl this comments board. However I dont blame Datacom - their staff performed extremely well under exceptional circumstances.
Although this is the only data center to be publicly affected by the storm, how many high rise CBD buildings were also flooded ? I ran past three on Collins St with lobby slash/ wading pools as I jumped 2 metre patches of ice/hail scampering for spare parts. And splashed my way to the lift in our office lobby.
10 minutes of hail = ice blocked down pipes + 40mm of rain = Roof fail. My guess where it went wrong.
I thoroughly doubt it was maintenance or negligence at fault, this is a very well run DC and they own the building.

Its not the emotional "were gonna sue" sentiment that pisses me off, its the fact that some stupid twat has gone and flickr'd photos of the facility. Your the reason I and my team cannot carry mobiles into this DC.

The colo business is much like an ISP - theres no thankyou's only f-you's. Blame Al Gore and his inconvenient truth.
jamieM
Mar 8, 2010 11:53 PM
TheEvilMuppet and drawkcab, you are both clueless. The reason datacentre's don't like you to take photos in their facilities is TO PROTECT THE IP OF OTHER CUSTOMERS WITHIN THIER FACILITY. These photos do not identify anyone or violate anyone's intellectual property. If these photos were not taken then Datacom's BS about nothing going wrong would be impossible to refute.

In any case trying stop anyone taking photos within a datacentre (or anywhere else for that matter) is impossible. Camera's are built into almost every electronic device. Any laptop built in the last two years has an inbuilt camera. What's next, do we check in our laptop prior to entering the datacentre?
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 9, 2010 12:15 AM
jamieM, before you accuse me of being clueless, please attend to your pathetic grammar and complete lack of comprehension. Let's take each of your incorrect assertions in turn, shall we?

Your statement about data centres (observe - no apostrophe) and the "likes" of such facilities is irrelevant. Datacom's NDAs and contracts require you to agree to no photography. Any other statements you make are completely superfluous.

Regarding Datacom's statements not being correct, I myself have provided details as to what impact was felt as have others. Your requirement for pretty pictures on top of statements made by Datacom and others here is quite worrying.

Your final statement regarding the enforcement of a no photography rule - cameras (no apostrophe for a plural - I expect 12 year old kids to know that) are indeed built into many devices. There are two obvious options - metal detectors in mantraps or mandatory escort for all data floor access.

Both of these options increase costs for no reason other than to accommodate the non-compliant and ignorant actions of people such as the people who published these photos and yourself who is either ignorant of the specifics, unable to read or unable to honour the terms of a basic contract or NDA.
jamieM
Mar 9, 2010 12:47 AM
TheEvilMuppet, congrats you win the spelling contest, however not the argument.

You are clearly one of those people who love rules just for the sake of rules. No doubt you spend most of your day telling people "sorry that's our policy".

I was trying to bring attention to the reason behind the rule. Believe it or not your say so on a forum is not enough evidence to refute a data centre CEO. Most people (rightly) expect to see evidence.
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 9, 2010 1:13 AM
jamieM, I win the grammar contest. There's a difference between grammar and spelling you've clearly failed to grasp.

If you have such an objection to rules, why should anyone pay any attention to the rules you're attempting to use to justify your opinions? What I spend my day doing is completely irrelevant, but I do not cite policy without complete justification. The fact that you look upon such statements as somehow substandard shows that you are either a victim of policy or an opponent of policy - issues you need to address yourself.

Regardless, your ignorant pontificating is completely irrelevant. Upon agreeing to a contract, you are bound by the rules detailed in said contract. Your inability to grasp this is evidence of some sort of mental defect.

As for my "say so" on a forum not being enough evidence to refute a data centre *Managing Director* (it's ok - you got the title wrong and the author got the capitalisation wrong) assumes that I am in collaboration with a number of other entities making similar statements here and elsewhere. I can assure you, I am not.

All of your contentions are weak and based entirely on your ill-informed opinion. The fact that you are refuting my correctness based not on fact but on a meta-analysis of societal constructs shows that you have no contentions worthy of consideration.

stealthy
Mar 9, 2010 4:21 AM
TheEvilMuppet
Wow. That is about the only word that comes to mind regarding your argument about being grammatically correct.
Dude, the freaking data center flooded... you are citing the NDA/Policy regarding pictures??? I am sure they didn't adhere to their own NDA/Contract either cause they sure are definitely in non-compliance of their Tiers. Who is to say, they didn't break any other rules of properly informing all customers etc. about the extent of the damage.

Telling a customer, "Uhm, your server doesn't have power", instead of saying, "Ahh, your server is in 4 feet of water, and has absolutely no chance of working", kinda seems dodgy.

The facilities that I am currently using, don't have any, "no photography", related policies. If as a customer I don't want my presence known visually, I just don't label my servers/switches with my Company/Address info. etc.

Either way, data centre flooding is contrary to that business model. I as a customer won't want to use a data centre thats prone to natural disasters like, "rain".

Oh, and I couldn't care less about being grammatically correct, cause objective of my conversation is to pass my point across. If you need that in grammatically correct format, then obviously you don't get the *point* of the arguement/discussion.
The pictures are probably the only reason, that the world now knows about the flooding. The Management should have cleary done a better job of containing the disaster. Customers should've been notified immediately of the issue.
They deserve to be sued because of their incompetency in risk evaluation and customer relationship. We don't even need the media disaster in the mix, to express on how bad this is.


Oh, by the way for all that grammatically correctess rant...I quote, "Regardless, your ignorant pontificating is completely irrelevant.", why do I think that this statement is shouting Oxymoron.
stoomy
Mar 9, 2010 5:24 AM
stealthy:

There is nothing in those pictures that proves anything regarding the flood. They were not needed for the story to be broken.

IANL, but your mother's assertion that "two wrongs don't make a right". Will likely be up-held in any court.

There is nothing Oxymoronic in the sentence you're quoting.
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 9, 2010 8:21 AM
stealthy, I suggest you learn to read. I can assure you, that any facility you have gear in that markets itself as an actual data centre does have such a policy.

Regarding containment of the disaster, as you clearly do not have equipment in this facility (as evidenced by your comments), you actually don't know as much about the disaster as those of us who do have equipment housed at Datacom Melbourne who have either been there since or have had staff in attendance since.

As for them following other rules in contracts, Datacom definitely do the right thing here. Businesses that don't rarely stay in business.

And if you couldn't care less about being grammatically correct, then I suggest you address that in your own time - "grammatically correct" is two words, after all.
EMwyres
Mar 9, 2010 8:40 AM
EvilMuppet - While I agree with most of the points you have made, if you actually believe that your "better than anyone else" position on the grammar of the persons posting to this thread is in any way relevant to the topic at hand, I suggest you become a school teacher and spread "the good word", rather than act like an arrogant tosser. Someone with such excellent grammar should not be wasted on the internet!
Bob
Mar 9, 2010 9:24 AM
I'm not sure what is funnier, that a datacentre would have a leaking roof or that supposed top tier carriers would have equipment there. Buy cheap, buy twice.
Obsydia
Mar 9, 2010 10:21 AM
So Evil Muppet, when the managing director of the data center lies to his customers about damage to the their equipment, how exactly is Datacom doing "the right thing here"? Or how breaking a clause in a contract makes someone a "pathetic excuse for a human being"?

Get over yourself. You're acting like a jerk.
marcelhartmann
Mar 9, 2010 10:38 AM
I've worked for Datacom. While I have not personally met Michael Browne (I was in Sydney, working under the Bigpond contract), I can tell you that [EDIT] the team leaders get paid just over $40,000, the call centre workers $34,000, and the really technical people get but a smidgen of their true value.

Edited by BrettWinterford: 9/3/2010 10:50:10 AM
carl
Mar 9, 2010 12:19 PM
@Stealthy

I'd say datacom was correct only saying the power was out.
They told the truth the power did go out. it is up to them to tell customers affected by hardware damage personally/ directly.

It is inappropriate to say, "servers are water damaged" when your server isn't affected, at the time they knew power was out but probably had yet to identify which companies servers were affected.

@stealth
"I just don't label my servers/switches with my Company/Address info. etc."

this stance would make it difficult as they can't contact you as quickly without physical labels on the server they would fall back to software data which well was offline.
How can they notify you that your server was damageD?
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 9, 2010 5:53 PM
@EMwyres - I don't believe I'm better than anyone else in that regard, but allegations of "cluelessness" tend to invite such responses.

@Obsydia - You can't argue with Datacom having a right to make statements as they see fit. Observe that my statement was with regard to general conduct, not this specific incident.
nine9
Mar 9, 2010 9:26 PM
@TheEvilMuppet.
So do you work for Datacom Chris?
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 10, 2010 10:09 AM
@nine9 - No, I definitely don't work for Datacom. I sign in at the front door just like everyone else.
Sams
Mar 10, 2010 2:26 PM
ThEvilMuppett: "Upon agreeing to a contract, you are bound by the rules detailed in said contract. Your inability to grasp this is evidence of some sort of mental defect."

No, you are not always bound by a contract. There are exceptions. Just one example is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscionability

Your inability to grasp this is evidence of .. well, let's not go there. :-)
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 10, 2010 5:42 PM
@Sams:

Of course there are exceptions, in circumstances such as you mention - in this case it's definitely evidence of me not being exhaustive. :-)

As complying with clauses of a contract that make statements about conduct that do not result in restriction of trade or contravention of law are very standard, I'm not sure that such exceptions and releases are relevant in this specific instance.
Sams
Mar 10, 2010 11:16 PM
@TheEvilMuppet: ... and beyond what is legal: the guy that stood in front of the tanks in Tienanmen Square was no doubt breaking many laws - and yet we applaud him.
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 11, 2010 7:11 PM
@Sams: True, but you're overreaching with that comparison.

Failing to abide by the terms of a contract which you've willingly entered into is very different to protesting the decisions of the state as they relate to the individual, even to those who view the PRC regime as oppressive.

As unfortunate as the event at Datacom has been, it's hardly unreasonable for someone who has made a professional undertaking to follow through. Although one could argue that Datacom have not honoured their obligations, one can categorically state that the originator of the photographs of the facility has not honoured theirs.

Sams
Mar 11, 2010 10:29 PM
@TheEvilMuppet: True, but you're overreaching with that comparison.

Not overreaching, but giving an extreme example. There are situations where you can and should break he rules and I suspect that is the case here.

"Although one could argue that Datacom have not honoured their obligations, one can categorically state that the originator of the photographs of the facility has not honoured theirs. "

Well that was a given. We can also categorically state "well done". As if the harm of photographing a water-damaged roof compares ... what a laugh.
BernieG
Mar 11, 2010 11:24 PM
Anywhoooo... I have run co-location data centres continuously for 10 years, and I really feel for those poor souls in Melbourne.

The Operators (on the ground)take great pride in providing service to customers. This must have broken their hearts.

Thanks DJ for the early insults. We are trying to weed your kind out of the industry - I guess we need stronger weed killer :)
TheEvilMuppet
Mar 12, 2010 12:28 AM
@Sams: So you're condoning and praising failure? It doesn't matter whether the "harm" compares here - it's still failure! You're seemingly subscribing to the delightful "us versus them" mentality that promotes stereotypes and other counterproductive social outcomes.

Have you considered what sort of harm some Datacom customers might consider those photographs to have on their operations? Do not claim that I'm reaching here, as I've spoken to more than one group who are very much of this mindset.

Regardless, the incident report from Datacom explicitly states what happened as do the notices from various effected parties - many of which were available well before this story was published.

There are plenty of people who have gear in Datacom who have had to make major changes to their work practices (and a number of us have had major production-level impacts as a result) due to no mobiles being allowed on the data floor. Quite a few of us were not far off working out a means of that problem being sorted out but this has totally ruined that progress. As absolutely nothing has been gained by these photos being published, you've missed the point.

@BernieG: You've made a statement that should have been made much earlier! :-) I think that such a statement applies to both the clients who have gear and businesses that have been impacted here and the staff who have had to deal with the aftermath - absolutely no one wants to be in this situation. Two of the happier guys in the NOC and the GM look like they've aged a lot in the space of the last week.
Sams
Mar 12, 2010 11:54 AM
TheEvilMuppet: "@Sams: So you're condoning and praising failure? It doesn't matter whether the "harm" compares here - it's still failure! You're seemingly subscribing to the delightful "us versus them" mentality that promotes stereotypes and other counterproductive social outcomes. "

Sorry, I don't really fathom what you are getting at there. Do you?

"Have you considered what sort of harm some Datacom customers might consider those photographs to have on their operations?"

Why don't you explicitly list them and we can discuss them. Are you saying the photos are fake, or that the truth should be covered up?
sparkymelb
Mar 12, 2010 3:33 PM
Well said Bob - "Buy Cheap, Buy Twice" - Exactly!
There are a large number of ISP's, HSP's and Corporates in Datacom and the majority were not affected, We were one of them that had zero interruption to power or crossconnects. For us, Datacom handled this well. We have only a relatively small budget for Datacenter and Connectivity, but even we plan well enough to spread it accross multiple facilities with modest IDC connectivity for failover redundancy. As good as a facility may be... just remember, the worst that could happen may happen anywhere one day, its up to network managers to manage the geographic resiliancy appropriately.
Neutrino
Mar 15, 2010 10:41 AM
Many buildings that house treasures of great value were damaged in that storm. Besides the innumerable building along Collins Street, the National Gallery of Victoria, The Arts Centre and others on the Swanston St/St Kilda Rd axis were also damaged. Exhibition spaces were damaged, shows cancelled, weddings re-located. The point of all this is that buildings are designed to meet certain criteria: perhaps a 1 in 100 year storm, or 1 in 10 year storm; a combination of flat roofing with mnimum fall, small outlets on down pipes and minimum spouting are sure recipes for a roof flood and ingress into the building envelope. Datacentres really need to be purpose built but the majority (with a few recent exceptions) are other buildings re-used. One must always plan with the very worst outcome in mind and only trade-off where buget becomes absolutely unavailable (and I mean after expoloring other options). It is true though that when I go to tender for such spaces I do carry out an architectural and engineering inspection. I don't need to see other customers gear, but I do need to see the infrastructure that supports it or I cannot give my clients any assurance that they will get the performance they are promised!
mr-internet
Mar 15, 2010 12:53 PM
Datacom data centre flooded by Melbourne storm-
Ry, Thought you'd move to the sports desk.

CBD Data Centres nationally are a risk. Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane no different.
Datacom is no better or worse than others in the CBD,

But this is why folks are looking at DR, Virtualisation and out of the older CBD Data Centres, power issues now floods.

CBD Data Centres- What could go wrong ?

Perhaps folks can learn from the 'experience'.

Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes- Oscar Wilde
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
NBN Co could miss revised June fibre targets
Analysis: Cutting it fine in the race to the line.
 
Review: Sydney's Opal smartcard
It's no Oyster card.
 
Rackspace puts price premium on Aussie public cloud
At least 17 percent more compared to US instances.
 
 
Photo courtesy of customer.
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

iTnews Academy: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 - Hyper-V
iTnews Academy: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 - Hyper-V
Interview: Australia's 'cloud-last' policy is dangerous.
Interview: Australia's 'cloud-last' policy is dangerous.
Interview: Vivek Kundra on Australia's 'cloud last' policy
Bankwest builds continuous delivery capability
Bankwest builds continuous delivery capability
To automatically deploy test/dev sandboxes by mid-year.
Veterans' Affairs sets sights on modernisation
Veterans' Affairs sets sights on modernisation
Data safe with Human Services, CIO says.
Citi Australia drops platform customisations
Citi Australia drops platform customisations
Technology chief shifts focus from building to leveraging systems.
VicRoads restructures IT team
VicRoads restructures IT team
Department moves to align with industry benchmarks.
Zurich Australia extends IT team offshore
Zurich Australia extends IT team offshore
Malaysian staff served from Australian data centres.
Leigh Berrell - Utilities CIO of the Year
Leigh Berrell - Utilities CIO of the Year
Yarra Valley Water CIO Leigh Berrell accepts his Benchmark Award for Utilities CIO of the Year.
Wayne McMahon - Retail CIO of the Year
Wayne McMahon - Retail CIO of the Year
Domino's Pizza CIO Wayne McMahon accepts his Benchmark Award for Retail CIO of the Year.
Inside Perpetual's ongoing IT transformation
Inside Perpetual's ongoing IT transformation
CIO Jenny Levy discusses how outsourcing will help the firm "simplify, refocus and grow".
Managing Complexity - Defence's Daniel McCabe
Managing Complexity - Defence's Daniel McCabe
Daniel McCabe, Assistant Secretary of Australia's Department of Defence, provides the audience at the iTnews Data Centre Strategy Summit with a deep dive into the organisation's data centre consolidation program.
How Facebook designed the data centre from scratch - Marco Magarelli
How Facebook designed the data centre from scratch - Marco Magarelli
The full keynote by Facebook data centre architect Marco Magarelli at the Australian Data Centre Strategy Summit. Magarelli details the design considerations behind the social network's Prineville, Oregon; North Carolina and Luleå, Sweden data centres.
Modernising Legacy Data Centres - Telstra's Jon Curry
Modernising Legacy Data Centres - Telstra's Jon Curry
Telstra general manager of managed data centres Jon Curry guides the audience at the iTnews Australian Data Centre Summit through the build of the telco's Clayton, Victoria data centre.
NSW Government launches NABERS data centre rating tools
NSW Government launches NABERS data centre rating tools
Matthew Clark from the NSW Department of Environment guides facilties managers through the details of the new NABERS data centre energy rating tool at the Australian Data Centre Strategy Summit.
NABERS launch panel: Australian Data Centre Strategy Summit
NABERS launch panel: Australian Data Centre Strategy Summit
Matthew Clark (NSW Dept of Environment), Greg Boorer (Canberra Data Centres), Glenn Allan (National Australia Bank), Mike Andrea (Strategic Directions) and Bob Sharon (Green Global Consulting) discuss the impact of the NABERS data centre rating.
Judges notes: Fortescue Metals [The Benchmark Awards]
Judges notes: Fortescue Metals [The Benchmark Awards]
iTnews' panel of judges discuss Fortescue Metals 'New World of Work" project, one of three shortlisted finalists for the Industrials category of the CIO Benchmark Awards.
Judges notes: Retail [The Benchmark Awards]
Judges notes: Retail [The Benchmark Awards]
iTnews' panel of judges discuss the shortlisted finalists for the Retail category of the CIO Benchmark Awards.
Judges notes: Pacific Aluminium [The Benchmark Awards]
Judges notes: Pacific Aluminium [The Benchmark Awards]
iTnews' panel of judges discuss Pacific Aluminium's lightning fast service desk refresh, one of three shortlisted finalists for the Industrials category of the CIO Benchmark Awards.
Judges notes: Domino's Pizza [The Benchmark Awards]
Judges notes: Domino's Pizza [The Benchmark Awards]
iTnews' panel of judges discuss Domino's Pizza's shift to hosted services, one of three shortlisted finalists for the Retail category of the CIO Benchmark Awards.
Judges notes: McDonald's Australia [The Benchmark Awards]
Judges notes: McDonald's Australia [The Benchmark Awards]
iTnews' panel of judges discuss McDonald's Australia's new self-service portal for employees, one of three shortlisted finalists for the Retail category of the CIO Benchmark Awards.
Latest Comments
Polls
Will you quit any cloud services in light of PRISM?

   |   View results
Yes
  67%
 
No
  33%
TOTAL VOTES: 57

Vote