Greens move to ban ATM fees

 

Bankers’ association aggrieved.

The Australian Greens party have announced plans to urge parliament to ban banks from charging Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) fees.

Banks including the Commonwealth Bank, ANZ and Westpac typically charged non-customers a $2 fee for performing transactions on their machines.

Greens Leader Bob Brown called the fee a "regressive private tax", noting that ATM fees did not exist in the UK.

"The $2 ATM fee is not a fee-for-service and the charge does not reflect the real cost of processing an ATM transaction," he said in a statement.

"Major banks should be banned from charging non-customers $2 every time they want to access their own money."

The Australian Bankers' Association (ABA) labelled the proposal "short-sighted" and "anti-competitive", and said it would force the introduction of new fees for bank customers.

It could also mean that less ATMs would be deployed in remote parts of the country, the ABA claimed.

"ATM fees are not a tax as Senator Brown asserts," said ABA CEO David Bell.

"They pay for the installation, maintenance, repairs, and upgrading of ATMs, as well as security," he said. "If banks cannot recoup the costs associated with running their ATM fleets, then all these things might suffer."

Bell said that customers could use their own banks' ATMs to reduce or avoid fees, and urged Brown to consult with the Reserve Bank, police, banks, ATM deployers and bank customers on the proposal.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Greens move to ban ATM fees
"Don't feed the troll."
By Sams
 
 
 
Comments: 12
scooterbiscuit
Mar 4, 2010 3:13 PM
I love their reasons for the $2 fee - The Australian Bankers' Association (ABA) labelled the proposal "short-sighted" (huh?)and "anti-competitive" (how, exactly? – by anti-competitive do they mean that all the banks got together and colluded to charge the $2 fee and make a tonne of money out of it), and said it would force the introduction of new fees for bank customers (let’s face it, banks have never had to be forced to introduce new fees to customers).

It could also mean that less ATMs would be deployed in remote parts of the country (yeah right! Play the poor little rural Australia being victimised by the Greens), the ABA claimed.

"ATM fees are not a tax as Senator Brown asserts," said ABA CEO David Bell.

"They pay for the installation, maintenance, repairs, and upgrading of ATMs, as well as security," he said. "If banks cannot recoup the costs associated with running their ATM fleets, then all these things might suffer." (Hmmmm, banks haven’t had a problem installing, and running their ATM fleets in the past…. Why now? And let’s be honest – that $2 fee isn’t paying for the ATMs it’s just profiteering).

Bell said that customers could use their own banks' ATMs to reduce or avoid fees, and urged Brown to consult with the Reserve Bank, police, banks, ATM deployers and bank customers on the proposal.
mmaust
Mar 4, 2010 4:17 PM
banks have been putting in fees and charges since deregulation. fact is the major banks reduced counter staff and introduced ATMs as a means of reducing cost. to say they need the fees to pay for maintenance is rubbish. they already have saved money by reducing staff.
Digger11
Mar 4, 2010 4:31 PM
maybe this "regressive private tax" is homophobic and is clearly a key point in a green political parties platform !!!
Who voted for these morons anyway ??

Sams
Mar 4, 2010 5:07 PM
I think "tax" is the wrong word, and has been overused to try to implement/defeat proposed policy, but the goal is laudable. Banning may not be the only way to achieve this though. I wonder if there is a way to open up the ATM network to competition (in a secure way!). Or a National ATM Network = NATMN (just kidding).
Gall of it
Mar 4, 2010 5:13 PM
Some politician just show there ignorance when they open their mouth, Fee are regulated by them so they can change them. However the service will match the income from them. Becareful what you wish for Mr Brown/Green. The fees are proping up the less profitable ATM like Tasmania regions (Your electorate). Fees are why the little guys have atms you would advantage the big guys if you got rid of them. Might be worth talking to the your mates (in government) who look after it before commenting if you care.
Sams
Mar 4, 2010 5:28 PM
In terms of who votes for Greens, all I could find after a short look was this UK study, published in Intelligence:

"Childhood intelligence predicts voter turnout, voting preferences, and political involvement in adulthood: The 1970 British Cohort Study"
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W4M-4TKXD92-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=d995026139aa1e947c371c6cd915efd4

with a summary of results reported here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2008/nov/03/greenpolitics-liberaldemocrats

Green - 108.3
Liberal Democrat - 108.2
Conservative - 103.7
Labour – 103
Plaid Cymru - 102.5
Scottish National - 102.2
UK Independence - 101.1
British National - 98.4
Did not vote/None of the above - 99.7

Happy to hear about any other research people can find.
Digger11
Mar 4, 2010 5:31 PM
You really should not be quoting British research. We are an Asian nation now and at some stage Asians will outnumber the British - so I suggest you find some more relevant Asian research to more accurately reflect future Australian Voter sentiment.
Sams
Mar 4, 2010 7:56 PM
Interestingly, the British Nationals ("The BNP seeks to restore the overwhelmingly white ethnicity of Britain that existed prior to 1948" - source Wikipedia) came out bottom, below those couldn't manage to fill in their form correctly or find a polling booth.
nate.cochrane
Mar 5, 2010 11:25 AM
If banks were a bit more diligent in protecting their customers from card skimmers then they would have a greater claim to the $2 fee. Until that happens and they provide a safe banking environment then their claims will always be suspect.
For more on alleged card-skimming scammers caught skipping the country: http://itnews.com.au/News/168769,alleged-card-skimmer-faces-court.aspx
Mordd
Mar 5, 2010 8:34 PM
Digger11 said: maybe this "regressive private tax" is homophobic and is clearly a key point in a green political parties platform !!!

So bob brown can only comment on a homophobic issue because he happens to be gay? Frankly your comment reeks of homophobia.

Digger11 said: Who voted for these morons anyway ??

Considering our proportional representation and preferential voting system, the exact right number to get them the current number of senate seats they hold. Greens do not rely on prefernces alone, in fact Bob was re-elected last time with a very clear majority vote, he didn't need any preferences as he had more than enough primary vote to take his seat outright.

Keep coming with the dodgy comments though digger11, maybe this time you could try actually attacking the facts though and not generalising inaccurate stereotypes hmmm?
Mordd
Mar 5, 2010 8:36 PM
Digger11 said: You really should not be quoting British research. We are an Asian nation now and at some stage Asians will outnumber the British - so I suggest you find some more relevant Asian research to more accurately reflect future Australian Voter sentiment.

Well thats just outright racism, shame on you Digger11, I expected better from you, honestly you deserve to be censored on here if thats the only level of commenting you are cabaple of now.
Sams
Mar 5, 2010 10:55 PM
Don't feed the troll.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Highlights from SAP Sapphire Now 2013
All the keynote action from one of the world's biggest SAP events.
 
How do I: Improve my presentation skills
A repeatable process to follow.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1613

Vote