ASIC abandons One.Tel appeal

 

Cost and time key factors.

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission will not appeal the dismissal of its case against executives of the failed junior telco One.Tel.

The decision means ASIC will be up for a legal bill in excess of $14 million.

ASIC chairman Tony D'Aloisio said that "public interest considerations, cost and [the passing] of time were key factors in deciding not to appeal".

"We have reached the view that the Judge's decision turns on questions of fact and that there are no important points of law which should be reviewed on appeal," he said.

"Further, the case concerns conduct which occurred in 2001. A successful appeal would most likely result in a retrial causing a further significant delay to the final resolution of the matter."

The NSW Supreme Court dismissed civil proceedings against One.Tel founder Jodee Rich and its finance director Mark Silbermann in November last year.

Rich and Silbermann had been taken to task over their role as directors in the collapse of mobile services company One.Tel.

In December, the corporate watchdog lodged a notice of its intention to appeal the ruling.


ASIC abandons One.Tel appeal
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1776

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?