Block The Filter accused of censorship protest hijack

Feb 17, 2010 3:27 PM
Tags: block | filter | censorship | protest | hijack | anonymous | titstorm | freeweb

Anonymous faction rebukes picnic organisers.

Activist group Block The Filter has denied accusations that it tried to hijack the Adelaide leg of planned national protests by a faction of Anonymous this weekend to promote its own "cyber safety picnic days" in March.

Block The Filter was one of a number of previously fragmented groups that opposed the Federal Government's proposed internet filtering plan. It is now aligned with the Electronic Frontiers Association-backed Open Internet campaign.

Spokesman Phil Brown told iTnews he had contacted the South Australian organiser of the Project Freeweb protests to offer assistance and share his views.

"I was not trying to hijack the Anonymous protests," Brown said.

"I suggested to the SA organiser that without permits or anything the police will move them on fairly quickly from the steps of parliament house and also that a small protest - [with an] expected turnout of less than 100 from what I can gather - could in fact harm the cause."

Block The Filter was one of two action groups to this week join Electronic Frontiers Australia under its Open Internet umbrella.

Brown said he suggested to the Anonymous organiser that instead of "taking a small number of people to parliament house, you walk through high traffic areas such as shopping malls handing out flyers and getting people to sign the EFA petition.

"This raises awareness about the issue far more than a protest and this is what the issue needs at this point in time," Brown said.

"The message that I would have pushed at the Anonymous rally would have been about the issue and not the Block The Filter event."

However, this appeared unsupported by comments on Facebook attributed to a user ‘Phil Brown'.

"We are using Febuary [sic] 20th to promote March 6th, so signs or whatever you want to bring and wander round getting people to sign the petition and hand out flyers, and most likely they will be Block-the-Filter flyers, if we get the flyer finished soon," the post read.

That was the point of contention with Project Freeweb, which rebuked Brown via its website.

"The protest will go ahead as planned, despite Phil Brown's attempts to turn it into unpaid labour to promote his picnic," Freeweb organisers wrote.

Project Freeweb protests were scheduled to take place in a number of cities on Saturday.

Electronic Frontiers Australia has condemned the protests and said it will not support them.

"We are aware that Anonymous is now organising street protests on 20 February, dubbed Project Freeweb," EFA campaign organiser Peter Black said in a statement yesterday.

"However, EFA does not support these protests. Any attempt to legitimise the actions of Anonymous only makes it easier for the Government to dismiss the opposition to its filter as fringe extremists."


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Block The Filter accused of censorship protest hijack
"@btone: It's certainly made headlines. The question is whether or not "no publicity is bad publicity"."
By SvenV
 
 
Comments: 4
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Res
Feb 17, 2010 6:04 PM
Perhaps Peter Black forgets that members of Anonymous are aussie net users too, any legal public action should be condoned and supported, not condemned.

This affects us all, and we are all entitled to a voice, not just EFA.

The more organisations that make a noise and create public awareness, the better.
btone
Feb 17, 2010 7:08 PM
@res: Perhaps Peter Black forgets that members of Anonymous are aussie net users too, any legal public action should be condoned and supported, not condemned.

No problem with that, but by their so far illegal, peurile and immature t.storm efforts Anonymous has done considerable harm to the standing of anti filter campaigners.
btone
Feb 17, 2010 7:08 PM
@res: Perhaps Peter Black forgets that members of Anonymous are aussie net users too, any legal public action should be condoned and supported, not condemned.

No problem with that, but by their so far illegal, peurile and immature t.storm efforts Anonymous has done considerable harm to the standing of anti filter campaigners.
SvenV
Feb 18, 2010 3:16 AM
@btone: It's certainly made headlines. The question is whether or not "no publicity is bad publicity".
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Oracle shuts down open source test servers
Playing nice with the open source community, Larry?
 
Google hosts election debate
Lundy, Fletcher and Ludlam face off on tech policies.
 
Telstra fined $18.5m for exchange access
Kept competitive DSLAM kit out.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government ..."
by hsvandrew Jul 31, 2010 9:33 AM
 
"@Nate - my fears are that if we use a national consortium as an interface to international ..."
by heavenlyhaloes Jul 31, 2010 12:41 AM
 
"Did anybody notice that on Apple's website the iPhone is missing the AT&T logo on the top bar? ..."
by brownenicola Jul 30, 2010 10:18 PM
 
"@digger11 - when will you learn just to remain quiet when you don't have all the facts or a ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 7:13 PM
 
"Wakie is right, Digger11 is either an exceptional forum troll or a massive moron. For those who ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 6:51 PM
Polls
Did Google breach the Telecommunications Interception or Privacy Acts during its WiFi wardrive?

   |   View results
Yes. There is no excuse for collecting this data.
  28%
 
No. If your wireless network is unsecured, you have no right to complain
  72%
TOTAL VOTES: 1873

Vote