Net filter legislation to go public by March

 

Senator's blog gives first indication of timing.

Australians will get their first look at the wording of the Federal Government’s proposed internet filtering laws in “late February or March”, according to Labor Senator Kate Lundy.

The timing was revealed as Lundy moved to clarify her views on the controversial policy.

“This is a question best answered by the office of Minister Conroy, however I expect it will be late Feb or March,” Lundy said.

“My understanding is that the bills are not going to be introduced this week, and next week is Senate Estimates, so it will probably be in the following sitting fortnight in February or later in March.”

A spokesman from the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy said the legislation would be introduced in the Autumn 2010 parliamentary sittings.

Lundy said the resumption of parliament this week had enabled her to continue to lobby her own party to amend the current proposal.

She believed the policy could be improved by allowing adults and businesses to ‘opt out’ of the regime - something she termed “mandatory choice”.

“I believe that the best path forward is one of mandatory choice where as part of their normal interaction with an ISP all subscribers are provided information about filtering so they can make an informed choice (to filter or to not filter), and at that point we have a fantastic opportunity to provide further information and resources about general Internet safety best practices,” Lundy said.

“This option ought to be changeable at any point and re-asked at subsequent service renewals.”

Lundy also moved to clarify suggestions the Government had shifted the goalposts on internet filtering from an opt-out clean feed to mandatory filtering.

“Most of the confusion stems from media reports of references by the Minister [Conroy] to adults opting out but these were in relation to earlier consideration of an additional aspect of filtering for X classified content, for which adult consumption is not illegal,” she said.

“The clarification by the Minister that the filter would only apply to RC removed the need to make a distinction of an adult opt-out component.”


Net filter legislation to go public by March
"RIP internet freedom. Goodbye 4chan. Hello manditory censorship. I'm just glad that I am not in the country and wont be for a while yet. Someone let me know when the monkeys have been kicked out ..."
By peterniss
 
 
 
Comments: 7
bengrubb
Feb 3, 2010 9:10 AM
Conroy said December 15 he exppected "to introduce legislation during the Autumn 2010 parliamentary sittings".

This was backed up in proposed legislation on the APH website: http://www.dpmc.gov.au/parliamentary/docs/proposed_legislation.pdf

Lundy's blog isn't an indication really, she's just going by what Conroy said last year and what Parliament has put into it's schedule.
BrettWinterford
Feb 3, 2010 9:49 AM
You can't stay away Ben! You must miss us! :)
There's always a guest spot on The Crunch for you!
ITrant
Feb 3, 2010 10:15 AM
Excellent article, perfectly summarising the government's snow job. The senator admits "I do not believe a mandatory filter will achieve the policy goals stated", mumbles at length about wanting a "mandatory choice", and deep in the middle of here 'thoughts' drops the bombshell "it was always meant to be mandatory for everyone".

She candidly admits it would require a "conscience vote" to get party members to cross the floor. Perhaps we need to also be lobbying for a conscience vote on government filtering of the fundamental communications medium of the 21st century. Imagine if the government wanted to inspect every item in the postal system! There would be no techno-fear about that, would there?

It's worth reading the senator's 'thoughts', because it reveals the other tactic in use here - blaming parent's ignorance of the internet for needing a filter. Parents are well aware of the internet, and are fully aware that there's no easy way to protect their children, but not supposed to challenge the government's assertion that filtering will??

I refer you again to the senators comments that the filter will not achieve the stated aims, and the dead giveaway, that the filtering was always meant for everyone. Internet filtering is not to protect children, it is to enable government control over what everyone can read on the internet. The great firewall of Australia indeed!

To see how flawed the filter and the government's testing was, read http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/02/filtering-the-facts-conroy-slips-up-when-hitting-back/
anonymous
Feb 3, 2010 11:12 AM

Why couldn't we have had the knowledgeable and intelligent Lundy as comms minister instead of the grub Conroy?

bengrubb
Feb 3, 2010 3:05 PM
@BrettWinterford I still lurk. Loving the Crunch with Munir.
saveus
Feb 3, 2010 4:41 PM
Though Lundy deserves credit for bringing some measures of reason into this insane policy, she’s still implying that censoring RC content is perfectly OK.

The problem is that RC is actually a very broad category in Australia, far broader than other western democracies, and under this filter ACMA bureaucrats will be entitled to add content to the blacklist purely on their assumption or guess that it might likely be classified as RC. This opens a loophole for anything whatsoever to be blocked despite not being of the extreme types that Conroy enjoys listing off. Eg:. a video on peaceful euthanasia, an online video game rated beyond MA, a webpage explaining how to bypass the filter or divulging anything about the blacklist.

Then there’s scope creep and future governments: What prevents future politicians broadening classification guidelines such that more falls as RC, and what stops the membership of the censorship board gradually becoming dominated by special interest or religious groups?
peterniss
Feb 3, 2010 8:14 PM
RIP internet freedom. Goodbye 4chan. Hello manditory censorship. I'm just glad that I am not in the country and wont be for a while yet. Someone let me know when the monkeys have been kicked out and its sane enough to return.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  90%
 
No
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 62

Vote