Federal Police apply for 573 phone intercepts

 

Average length of covert operations revealed.

The Australian Federal Police applied for 573 telecommunications interception warrants in the last financial year, according to newly released statistics.

The statistics, part of a response to a question in writing from Greens Senator Scott Ludlam, also shed light on the average length of ‘controlled operations' conducted by the federal law enforcement agency.

Controlled operations are covert or undercover operations where officers are authorised to do things that would otherwise be illegal so they can gather evidence of serious crimes, according to the Attorney-General's department.

The average length of controlled operations in 2008-9 financial year was 84 days. The previous year it was 69 days.

The AFP also provided figures for the 2009-10 financial year. It said covert operations had averaged 54 days in length so far.

Senator Ludlam also received detailed responses on the limits agencies operated in when it came to information gathered by intercepting phone calls.

Specifically, the AFP confirmed that, under some circumstances, information gathered for one crime could be used to investigate others suspected offences.

"Section 67 of the TIA Act allows an agency which has lawfully obtained information by telecommunications interception to use it and to disclose it for a ‘permitted purpose'," the statement said.

"The definition of a ‘permitted purpose' includes use of information to investigate prescribed offences other than offences for which the information was initially obtained.

"The term ‘prescribed offence' includes any offence punishable by at least three years imprisonment."

Information could be shared with a range of agencies for specific investigations under Australian law.


Federal Police apply for 573 phone intercepts
"Ahh see now we're getting somewhere..., wouldn't we have saved 3 days if you said all that earlier ! :P"
By scan06disk
 
 
 
Comments: 10
scan06disk
Jan 27, 2010 12:28 PM
So the cops haven't heard of VOIP.... lol
Ace
Jan 27, 2010 2:48 PM
I'm sure they have, but I can't see how it's relevant to this article. Are you suggesting it's legal to intercept calls over VOIP?
Slatts
Jan 27, 2010 8:50 PM
Ry Crozier wrote:
The Australian Federal Police applied for 573 telecommunications interception warrants in the last financial year

telecommunications
From the definition linked above I don't think VIOP is any safer than telephone, fax, email, radio or any other for of distance communication.
scan06disk
Jan 28, 2010 1:15 PM
@Ace Many People use VOIP(Skype)/Naked DSL(ISP)..., and interception of VOIP based conversations are quite difficult especially if the VOIP server-client connection is a secure one, as bits and info get scrambled and the cops wouldn't be able to make head or tail of it... lol
Ace
Jan 28, 2010 4:22 PM
And here was I thinking that the article was about the number of phone intercepts applied for by the Fed Police! Clearly I am not reading between the wavy lines you paint @scan
scan06disk
Jan 29, 2010 1:41 AM
@Ace my point being tracing normal day to day calls within Australia is great and good on em catching the 500~ !

VOIP is mainly use to converse with overseas organizations or in simple terms drug smuggling, terrorism, trafficking, illegal immigration, etc....; no one is Australia will discuss this openly anymore, even more after such reports OPENLY pop-up stating that call interception is being undertaken in secrecy ! lol

I have seen plenty of ignorant people like u..., pity you don't progress. *Think outside the box my friend*
Ace
Jan 29, 2010 6:07 PM
Sadly, you seem to be thinking outside the context of the article. I do not have the intimate knowledge of drug smuggling operations that you seem have @scan, but I do have intimate knowledge of VOIP, it's protocols and it's pluses and minuses.

Despite this, I can still not see how your comment references the article. I can't see the bit in the article where you say they are 'tracing normal day to day calls within Australia'. Is that just an assumption?

I usually can tell when some is struggling with an argument because they end up resorting to personal insults, in the belief that this will somehow make them appear smarter. Sad.
scan06disk
Jan 29, 2010 10:24 PM
You seem to love arguments Ace, what was you point anyway ? Slatts seem to have got it....

All i said was that the cops missed out on VOIP conversations, i don't really see what was wrong in that statement ??, except the fact that you HAD to say something that defied my comment, i don't get u... lol

If you do know the ins and the outs of how VOIP works, then i assume you know how most National/International calls work, they most certainly don't fly through thin air, or do they ?

Enlighten me with your great intellectual mind... lol
Ace
Jan 30, 2010 1:26 AM
As you probably know, the AFP having been using VOIP themselves since at least 2006. I would agree that more sophisticated crims might use well encrypted telecoms, however it is surprising (at least to me) how many crims are not in the least sophisticated about what they do. Cracking/sniffing apps like Cain&Abel have been around for quite a while - you can have a go yourself! The Feds do a little better than this.

Regarding 'thin air', if you use wireless, microwave etc, then yes, your voip call will most certainly be flying through thin air ;o)
scan06disk
Jan 31, 2010 1:07 AM
Ahh see now we're getting somewhere..., wouldn't we have saved 3 days if you said all that earlier ! :P
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  87%
 
No
  13%
TOTAL VOTES: 106

Vote