Stephenconroy.com.au resurfaces

 

Regulator says it's OK.

Australia's domain name regulator AuDA would not take down stephenconroy.com.au today after it was registered for a second time by a company to voice their opinion on censorship of the internet in Australia.

The domain was put into what is known as "pending delete" after AuDA said it had contravened its policy. This meant the domain name became unresolvable and unusable.

Once deleted, the domain was again registered by the company, named Sapia, but this time legitimately, said AuDA CEO Chris Disspain.

"This registration ... would be on the basis that they have a registered business name and that registered business name is 'stephenconroy' and so therefore they are entitled to stephenconroy.com.au because it is an exact match to their registered business name."

Disspain said AuDA, on the first occasion, had placed the domain into "pending delete" because Sapia had not provided it with a legitimate reason to have been eligible.

"They never provided [AuDA] with the information and they had 14 days to do this," he said.

"They never provided us with the information - with any information - to satisfactorily indicate that there was a close and substatinal connection between the business that Sapia had."

Disspain said AuDA's "original issue" with Sapia was that it had not provided AuDA with a "substantial connection" to owning the stephenconroy.com.au domain name. He explained how a "substantial connection" could be made.

"If I had a business called Chris’ flower shop I could register Chrisflowershop[.com.au]. I could also register my name. But I could also register tulips[.com.au] or roses[.com.au] because I could say there is a close and substantial connection."

Disspain said it was "absolutely legitimate" for the company to own the domain name on the second time they had registration the stephenconroy.com.au domain name as they had provided a registered trading name of "stephenconroy", a trading name registered by Sapia on December 18.

The stephenconroy.com.au domain name now redirects to stephen-conroy.com with a message stating its reasons for being eligible. On the stephen-conroy.com web site is a link to an image showing it had registered the trading name "stephenconroy" in Victoria and a link to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) web site to prove it.


Stephenconroy.com.au resurfaces
""I am feeling a bit like Andrew Bolt" You are welcome to him."
By Sams
 
 
 
Comments: 11
Sams
Jan 5, 2010 1:13 PM
And now there is this as well:

http://nationalfilter.net.au/

"On this site you can find important information about Australia's exciting new regime of Internet censorship. Please participate in our reader's poll, or read about how Internet filtering will protect your children, pets and other livestock."
bengrubb
Jan 5, 2010 1:28 PM
@Sams

I saw that.

I'm waiting for Chris Disspain to get back to me on that.
Oddy
Jan 6, 2010 10:00 AM
I feel it is MY responsibility to restrict the internet content my pets and livestock are allowed to see. My Little-Bo-Peep Internet Filter program has been restricting my flock from seeing the horrors out there for some time. If only they knew what lamb chops are, but I guess for them ignorance is bliss.
Digger11
Jan 6, 2010 10:56 AM
I am amazed there are so many unsociable miscreants that have no real meaning inlife and resort to stupid time-wastng stunts such as websites in ministers names.

This is surely where the saying "get a life" came from.
frances
Jan 6, 2010 12:52 PM
Dear ITNEWS,
My family and I and all decent English-speaking people everywhere are offended by the use of inlife as one word. Please censor all Digger11 communications forever.
Thank you,
Frances
deonast
Jan 6, 2010 1:26 PM
Digger11, I'm sure what you are saying also applies to those who leave comments on news articles but yet have nothing useful to add to the conversation. Hmm looks like I'm one of them as well.
scontrol
Jan 6, 2010 1:57 PM
Don't worry, even though my friends at auDA have let us down, I'll have my new Anti-Satire Amendments bill before parliament before you can say "Jesus Christ Our Saviour". I just have to classify the sites as RC, and voilĂ , no more unsociable material. I definitely think the world will be a better place for it. In fact, our best experts calculate that this simple act will saves the lives of thirty-three orphaned infants and six cuddly kittens in less than one hundred pfes.
Mordd
Jan 7, 2010 3:16 PM
Quote: "They never provided [AuDA] with the information and they had 14 days to do this," he said.

Except for the fact the domain was taken down within 24hours of the eligibility being challenged, they were not given the full 14 days as reports on ITNews at the time indicated.

Also, ROFLMAO @ Digger11 criticising himself so harshly like that, the irony is just too delicious. I also object to the use of this new word "inlife" and look forward to Digger11 campaigning against the people with no life who have registered http://nationalfilter.net.au/
- oh wait, thats right, if you are FOR the filtering scheme you you have meaning "inlife", but if you are against it you don't have meaning "inlife". Thanks for clearing that up for us Digger11!
Digger11
Jan 8, 2010 10:38 AM
Isn't is strange that when you can't find a flaw in my comments you start picking on spelling, grammar and typo's ????
I am feeling a bit like Andrew Bolt, when the Socialists cannot find flaws in his logic they attempt to discredit him by either 1. attacking the man, or 2. promoting their socialist doctrine rather than dealing with the facts.
Both techniques are often used in comments around here, and once you are aware of them they are easy to pick and then ignore.

BTW, I don't like the type of cheese they put on my Pizza's at the local Pizza hut so I am thinking of getting together with a few "Senior" Lecturers and Civil Rights ex-criminals to promote my new website "cheesetastesbadonmypizza.com.au".
Please all register to show your support.

GeordieGuy
Jan 8, 2010 4:31 PM
Ex criminals?

Know something I don't Digger? Or are you just making accusations in a public forum about people's character?
Sams
Jan 8, 2010 6:29 PM
"I am feeling a bit like Andrew Bolt"

You are welcome to him.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Google I/O 2013
Evolution not revolution.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
QLD Govt contributed to payroll project 'death spiral'
Inquiry hears from independent expert.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1613

Vote