EC accepts Microsoft's IE proposals

 

Browser ballot given green light.

The European Commission (EC) has today announced that it is satisfied with Microsoft's efforts to give users a choice of browsers, which the firm first suggested in July of this year.

The announcement follows years of wrangling, and a number of fines, as the parties sought to reach an agreement on how to tackle the anti-competitive nature of including Microsoft's Internet Explorer as the default browser on Windows machines.

Today's decision will give users a range of browsers to choose from, alleviates the EC's concerns, and boosts consumer choice, according to the EC.

Microsoft has agreed to offer new options within Windows, and let third-party computer manufacturers turn off the browser application in favour of alternatives, a dramatic change to its traditional method of including it as the default browser application.

Before this agreement was reached, the EC was concerned that Microsoft was abusing a dominant market position.

As part of the agreement, Microsoft will be expected to offer a 'choice screen' to users of Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7 for at least the next five years.

"Millions of European consumers will benefit from this decision by having a free choice about which web browser they use," said European competition commissioner Neelie Kroes.

"Such choice will not only serve to improve people's experience of the internet, but also act as an incentive for web browser companies to innovate and offer people better browsers in the future."

The EC had stated previously that Microsoft had an "artificial distribution advantage not related to the merits of its product on more than 90 per cent of personal computers", and was creating "artificial incentives for software developers and content providers to design their products or web sites primarily for Internet Explorer".

Opera Software was the most recent firm to take its complaints to the EC, having first filed anti-trust papers in July 2007.

"This is a victory for the future of the web. This decision is also a celebration of open web standards, as these shared guidelines are the necessary ingredients for innovation on the web," said Jon von Tetzchner, chief executive at Opera Software.

"Opera has long been at the forefront of web standards, which ensures that people have equal access to the web anytime, anywhere and on any device. We see the outcome of the EU's investigation as a testament to our mission."

A clause in the agreement allows the EC to review the commitments in two years, during which time Microsoft will be expected to report regularly to the EC.

"The days when companies could use poor standards support to tie down users are over," added Håkon Wium Lie, chief technology officer at Opera Software.

"The browser choice screen will give users access to better browsers with better support for web standards."

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


EC accepts Microsoft's IE proposals
"Rather than providing any real benefit to users, since anyone is already free to download and use a browser of their choice, I think this sets a very risky precedent, and will more than likely ..."
By ejobrien
 
 
 
Comments: 4
TimmyC
Dec 17, 2009 6:01 PM
I have never understood all this - why should MS be forced to to ship their OS with competitor's browsers?

I built 3 PCs last week and the first thing I did was fire up IE and download the latest version of Firefox. What's so hard about that? They got fined hundreds of millions of dollars for this and for what? providing you with a free browser pre-installed. What would you do if it wasn't installed and wasn't an option... hope you kept that firefox install CD? I'm always up for jumping on the sue microsoft bandwagon but this time it just seems unfair.
ap
Dec 19, 2009 10:21 PM
TimmyC, I have no idea how old you are or how long you have been involved with computer, but the answer lies in the history of Internet Explorer.

The Internet has been around since the 70's, but the Internet as we know it today first started taking shape in the early-90's. At that time Microsoft were not interested in the Internet, considering it a toy for geeks that would never gain mass appeal.

In order to use Windows on the Internet you needed 2 pieces of software that Microsoft did not produce - a Winsock networking stack and a web browser.

The winsock stack was in the form of a program called Trumpet Winsock (made by a guy in Tasmania, if memory serves me right) which cost about $15 Australian.

The *only* web browser around was call Netscape Navigator, and again you needed to pay for it (about $30 Australian from memory). Netscape sold versions of navigator that would run on all the popular Operating Systems of the day, but Windows versions made up most of their sales.

When Microsoft finally saw that the Internet was gaining mass appeal, they released Internet Explorer, but instead of charging for it as an add-on (like they do with MS Office) they decided to give it away for free.

Netscape tried to stay alive by making a better browser than IE, but people just weren't prepared to pay for a browser when their Operating System came with one for free.

The problem is that using an existing revenue stream (sales of MS Windows OS) to prop up another loss-making division in your company (Internet Explorer), with the intention of driving a competitor (Netscape) out of business is illegal under anti-competition laws.

As a business you are free to make a better product than your competitor; you are free to make a cheaper product then your competitor, but you cannot set out to destroy your competitor so that you can then enjoy a monopoly.

It was found in various courts that Microsoft were anti-competitive in their introduction of Internet Explorer – to make amends they must now offer what is left of their competition equal place within their Operating System next to Internet Explorer – at least in the EU.
ejobrien
Dec 20, 2009 12:37 AM
It's interesting though that it's the browser that has caused so much trouble for Microsoft. Why should the web browser not simply be considered an integral operating system tool, like Windows Explorer, or Paint?

There are lots of companies out there producing alternate file system browsers, however as far as I'm aware none are trying to sue Microsoft to stop them bundling Windows Explorer.

These days an operating system without a web browser is pretty much useless to the vast majority of customers. Microsoft really should be able to argue therefore that without Internet Explorer, Windows is not fully functional, and should not be released as a commercial product to the public (as it would be in breach of consumer protection laws).

Having said that, I personally use Firefox as my default browser, because I believe it is a superior product. However for many years there was nothing that could compete with Internet Explorer, and not just on price. Netscape lost the browser war, I believe, because for so long (at least 5 years, from the release of IE4, to the release of Netscape 7) it was pathetically out-featured by IE.

Incidentally, just to put my views into perspective, I've been using the web since before it had pictures, and before Netscape was even conceived. The first graphical browser I used was XMosaic on SGi workstations.
ejobrien
Dec 20, 2009 1:02 AM
Rather than providing any real benefit to users, since anyone is already free to download and use a browser of their choice, I think this sets a very risky precedent, and will more than likely just confuse end users.

It basically means that Microsoft will have to promote competing browser products over which they have no control. Most likely Opera or Netscape wont screw up your computer, but that's obviously not something that Microsoft can be expected to guarantee.

Microsoft writes the Operating System, they really aught to be able to include whatever software they like with it?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  84%
 
No
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 243

Vote