Rudd calls halt to broadband ‘rot’

 

Broadband Future Forum hears of 18 plans abandoned over past 12 years.

View larger image
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd arrives at UNSW, flanked by plenty of security.
View larger image
Senator Conroy and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
View larger image
Side-splitting laughs for Telstra-splitting pollies.

See all pictures here »

Kevin Rudd has told the Federal Government’s broadband future forum in Sydney that it was time to “stop the rot” and take action on broadband after revealing 18 plans were created to fix the problems in the past 12 years.

"The reality is that Australia's current broadband infrastructure is not up to scratch," the Prime Minister said.

"Slow broadband is holding our nation back. We've got to change that."

He reiterated global statistics he said put Australia behind "Turkey, even the Slovak Republic" on high-speed internet access.

And he said Australia was "in the bottom half of OECD rankings for broadband take-up".

"Before we came to office, there had been 18 plans released [to fix the issue] in 12 years while Australia still fell behind," Rudd said.

"It's time to stop the rot. It's time to make a difference. That's what we're doing."

Earlier, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy told industry delegates they were "uniquely positioned" to make sure all Australians benefited from the up to $43 billion National Broadband Network investment.

He told the industry "we must work together to develop plans and strategies... and business models to support future digital growth".


"Now, now, cosmicharade, you know the rule - anyone who mentions Hitler or communism loses. More seriously, noone expects corporations to behave like charities, though some monopolies seem to ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 8
mattybaus
Dec 10, 2009 10:49 AM
CRUDD RUDD - Broadband take up is not about the network - its about the cost. The cosat of any connection affects the takeup more than the avialbility.

This is the same as the garbage about making homes "affordable" by giving people money to get a home - its the repayments that make a home affordable. IDIOT
scan06disk
Dec 10, 2009 12:00 PM
Don't you want our broadband network to progress (capacity, age) ?, cost will be a by product, its gonna be similar to when ADSL first became available..., costs will obviously be higher, just to maintain the new network costs and data charges..., if you can't afford it, don't bother using your GPON, stick with ADSL2+ or cable.... lol
emkay100
Dec 10, 2009 1:23 PM
Hey mattybaus. the network is pretty important! If you cant' get a connection then it makes no difference what the cost of a plan is! Many people are stuck like me - 12 KM from a capital city centre but still unable to get any broadband due to the crappy network infrastructure. Please, Kevin, fix the network so we can all get some decent internet access!
cosmicharade
Jun 18, 2010 10:37 AM
Sorry, did the PM say something? I fell asleep when I heard "another way found to blow billions on 'stimulus' projects".
cosmicharade
Jun 18, 2010 10:39 AM
oh I just noticed this is an old article. Sounds about right, what's happened in this time? Another 'promise' quietly canned while our debt levels sky rocket.
ITrant
Jun 18, 2010 12:14 PM
Australia is being held to internet ransom by the telco with the most to lose. I'm pleased the Government is doing something about it. I just wish I was sure it would solve the problem. The bar seems to be set too low. Let's hope they exert more control over this than other stimulus projects.

Given Australia's population and disposition, infrastructure shouldn't be left in the hands of a greedy corporation… or a greedy government for that matter (it's getting harder to tell them apart these days).
cosmicharade
Jun 18, 2010 2:03 PM
Sorry, the government is doing what exactly? I must have missed whavever it is they are doing. Oh, wait, they have created a 'decision making framework' to 'delineate the programatic specificity' I'm sure. Amazing progress.

As for 'greedy corporations' - are you suggesting that they should behave like charities? Or that we should just nationalise everything and live in some sort of communist utopia? Yeah, history shows that model just works so well. Replace 'greedy corporations' who can actually execute delivery, with 'benign governments' who just consume taxes and blow money out the other end for political ends.
anonymous
Jun 18, 2010 4:15 PM

Now, now, cosmicharade, you know the rule - anyone who mentions Hitler or communism loses.

More seriously, noone expects corporations to behave like charities, though some monopolies seem to think that they are the charity.

We have trade practices legislation precisely because it is sometimes necessary.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  84%
 
No
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 243

Vote