Optus spends $25m on HFC network upgrade

 

Calls for telco reform legislation to be passed as soon as possible.

Optus has revealed it will spend $25 million upgrading its hybrid fibre-coaxial cable network.

In a speech to the Committee for Economic Development Australia, the telco's chief Paul O'Sullivan provided the funding detail after announcing the upgrade was taking place almost two weeks ago.

He said the upgrade would mean that Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney customers could access the internet at "speeds of up to 100 Mbps".

"Optus is taking the fight to the incumbent Telstra," he said.

O'Sullivan spent a considerable part of his speech calling for the telecommunications reform bill that is currently before Parliament to be passed when debate resumes in February next year.

The bill was due to be debated this week but that was derailed by the carbon pollution reduction scheme.

"In the last few weeks many pro-Telstra supporters have argued publicly that this delay is a good thing," O'Sullivan said.

"Some even argued that the legislation is unnecessary."

He told the Committee that the reform legislation was "the only way to break Telstra's stranglehold on the market and improve competition immediately."

O'Sullivan claimed the "debate and teeth-gnashing" over the potential impact the reforms would have on Telstra and its shareholders did not set a dangerous precedent for the government interfering with the ownership of other companies' assets.

And he believed Telstra's share price since the Government's separation announcement had "not demonstrated Armageddon for its shareholders.

"The majority of analysts retained their "Buy" recommendations on the Telstra stock and predicted share price accretion over the following 12 months as the reforms are implemented," O'Sullivan claimed.

"In the month that followed [the reform bill announcement] Telstra has been the subject of much speculation but has not seen any major re-rating of its share price."

O'Sullivan believed the reform legislation was important not only for leveling the playing field and transforming fixed line competition before the NBN rollout began but also to "make sure that Parliament sets the parameters for any deal done by Telstra with the Government on the NBN".

"Telstra must not be allowed to do a back room deal free from transparency and accountability and without Parliamentary oversight," he said.


Optus spends $25m on HFC network upgrade
"Ever heard of competition, anonymous?"
By sydneyla
 
 
 
Comments: 6
Bob
Dec 2, 2009 9:40 AM
Does an upgrade mean they will pick up the sections lying on the ground? Either stop wingeing and do it, or stop talking about it. As far as HFC cable goes, Optus was the incumbent from memory.
Tenoq
Dec 2, 2009 10:49 AM
Your memory does not serve you well, Bob.

Optus was not the incumbent in HFC. They did a deal to roll-out cable so there was some competition for Telstra. Unfortunately for Optus, their build was quite literally followed by Telstra vans rolling out their own HFC anywhere that Optus installed theirs. Basically Telstra not only wanted to hang on to it's monopoly on broadband/cable TV, but it also wanted to cripple Optus and make it's network not cost-effective to run.

It was a success - and now we have HFC networks that basically haven't been expanded at all since their inception. It's only now, again with the threat of new competiting infrastructure (the NBN) that either Optus or Telstra is getting off their backside and upgrading the service.
Digger11
Dec 2, 2009 3:25 PM
Tenoq - very very true.

Remarkably, Telstra have always denied this - but the day that Optus stopped rolling out HFC, the big T did the same thing, and cut the forecast 4 million homes passed to only 2.2 million.

I heard Big T then had to pay out FOXTEL for the lack of homes passed (but FOXTEL installed satellite anyway so didn't need the compensation - hahahaha Telstra, you stuffed up again !).
Bob
Dec 4, 2009 11:01 AM
So we are in agreement, Optus were first to roll out HFC cable, unsuccessfully. You can not use words like "unfortunately" in a commercial world. If you undertake a project you manage the commercial risk that a competitor will respond.
anonymous
Dec 4, 2009 11:49 AM
Yes, Bob, in a commercial world it's fine for your Telstra to use its enormous cashflow to put competitors out of business, so that the incumbent can maintain its effective monopoly and continue to screw the customers.

Really?
sydneyla
Dec 8, 2009 7:52 AM
Ever heard of competition, anonymous?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Vodafone Australia churn nears half a million for 2011
British joint owners 'not pleased'.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote