Biometrics becoming the norm for Aussie banking

 

Log into online banking at the blink of an eye.

Australian banks are taking a closer look at biometric authentication as a means of reducing fraud, thanks to an improved business case, increased consumer concerns about personal data and some impressive breakthroughs in technology.

In June, National Australia Bank became the first Australian bank to roll out a biometric-based solution for customer authentication, implementing a voice-based system for telephone banking customers.

Tim Cullen, head of direct channels with NAB, said the voice authentication has "far exceeded expectations."

"Nine out of ten customers when offered it are taking up the service," he said.

Cullen said the bank initially experienced some technical problems with the biometric-based technology when attempting to enrol users, but eventually managed to iron these issues out. The bank is now hoping to expand the option to mobile phone banking users, he said.

"Expanding voice biometrics into mobile Internet banking just seemed a logical extension from a usability perspective," he said.

Cullen said he would also consider deploying the solution to an online payments environment in a bid to help reduce card-not-present fraud.

As banks around the world gradually deploy chip-based cards with PIN authentication, Cullen points out fraud is simply shifting to card-not-present environments.

"For us it's about real-time monitoring of card-not-present transactions...but we certainly could move to voice and outbound (calls) for certain transaction types."

Beyond voice

Voice is just one of many biometric identifiers that can be used for the purposes of identification and authentication. In the US, biometric security specialist Global Rainmakers has been targeting banks with its HBOX iris scanning system.

Iris scanning is different to retina scanning, which requires the emission of light and close contact between the scanner and user.

Former Bank of America executive Jeff Carter now sits on the board of Global Rainmakers and says by the first quarter of 2010 the company will have the technology deployed in a mobile phone to allow remote authentication.

"It will go into a phone that has a high enough resolution to complete the registration," he said.

Fraud remains a major driver for banks considering the use of biometric-based authentication.

Customers have high expectations of the way banks manage their data said Cullen. "I think while banks are very protective over data, some other organisations aren't. So having a biometric protecting your identity provides added peace of mind."

"One of the questions we ask is what inconvenience are customers willing to accept for peace of mind, and I think tolerance in today's world is reasonably high, especially in terms of online banking" said Cullen.

In this case however, Cullen said the successful acceptance of voice biometrics has largely been as a result of its ease of use.

"There's probably not a lot of new technologies out there that create a safer experience that are easier to use or create a better customer experience."


Biometrics becoming the norm for Aussie banking
"OMG have they really not learned yet that biometrics is a really really bad idea? Firstly there is NO biometric scheme that is foolproof. Secondly, what do you do when your biometric information ..."
By somme1
 
 
 
Comments: 2
amgillard
Dec 1, 2009 8:26 AM
There are a number of other biometric identifiers available outside of either iris or retinal scanning that should have been mentioned, as these are perceived as quite invasive procedures that would be difficult to gain widespread public acceptance. Facial recogition has similar issues, and is more complicated as it requires a wider field of view.
Fingerprint scanning is generally accepted, but is also invasive in that it requires physical contact with the scanner, leading to problems obtaining valid scans due to dirt on the device or even health issues. There is also the "criminal" connotation with fingerprinting.
A better solution for example would be the Fujitsu PalmSecure device, that operates through contactless infrared scanning of the veins in your palm, has a .00008 percent false-acceptance rate, and has already been rolled out across 92 percent of Japan's ATM network since 2005.
somme1
Dec 2, 2009 2:58 PM
OMG have they really not learned yet that biometrics is a really really bad idea? Firstly there is NO biometric scheme that is foolproof. Secondly, what do you do when your biometric information is compromised? It's not like you can revoke it or change it. For example, there was a case of a carjacking where the car (a mercedes) had thumbprint security; because the didn't have experience with this security the carjackers simply cut off the drivers thumb and took it with them. Even DNA is not secure, as it's not exactly difficult to get a sample (activist groups have already collected DNA samples of some British MP's), and a company in europe has even found a way to create matching DNA material from a DNA profile. The companies promoting these biometric systems all have a vested interest in hiding the flaws in their system and claiming their system has very low failure rates, so don't get taken in by their marketing hype.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Tech staff spared in ANZ's 1000 job cuts
Cost cutting hits middle management.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote