Day 20: iiNet refuses to play police for film industry

 

iiNet continues closing statements.

ISP iiNet should not have to accept the film industry’s “outsourcing” of rights management or deal with the fallout from passing on infringement notices, the Federal Court heard today.

Continuing his closing statements, iiNet’s lead barrister Richard Cobden argued against what the film industry has portrayed as “reasonable steps” for dealing with copyright infringement, claiming they place an “unreasonable burden” on the ISP.

“We will not take on the rights holders’ outsourcing of their rights enforcement,” Cobden said.

“The rights holders and studios say this [allegedly infringing] activity is incredibly damaging, [that they] are suffering from the effects of online piracy. Presumably they still make some money [from films] but what they say to ISPs is ‘you fix it up for us, but we’re not going to pay a cent’.”

Cobden characterised that response as a “big ask” of iiNet or any ISP.

He said that passing on notices of alleged copyright infringement could burden ISPs with higher levels of “complaints and disputes”.

“If a customer wishes to dispute what they’ve been accused of [in the notice] then the debate would be between AFACT and the customer,” Cobden stated.

“At the moment, the proposal from AFACT is effectively that iiNet pass on this information. The customer can then say; ‘That’s not right. What’s your basis [for the accusation]?’

Cobden told the court that iiNet was not in a position to respond to these types of requests because the “basis” was information not contained in its IT systems.

“It’s nothing like dealing with our own business issues, where a customer might ask ‘what’s the basis’ and we can tell them ‘our records show you haven’t paid your bill’,” Cobden stated.

“There’s no reason we should have the burden of dealing with complaints and disputes [involving AFACT notices] or escalations to the TIO.”

Cobden also said these steps were unreasonable because not every ISP received notifications from AFACT.

“An ISP only becomes liable if AFACT decides to make it liable - until AFACT decides to target it with notifications,” he said.

“It goes to reasonableness - whether it’s reasonable to impose on iiNet that burden.”

Cobden said iiNet chief Michael Malone’s suggestion of the need for a change to the Copyright Act, the introduction of another “legislative instrument” or the formulation of an industry code to deal with copyright infringement was “sensible” - but not “a demonstration of iiNet’s refusal to accept copyright rules.”

Cobden was also highly critical of the alleged “reluctance” of copyright owners to pursue any of the sample of 20 iiNet account holders surfaced in discovery for the purposes of matching against the film industry’s evidence of alleged infringements.

He argued that iiNet’s alleged failure to terminate any of those 20 accounts did not make it “even more culpable” in the case.

“The real question is why the applicants haven’t done a single thing about it or all the other infringements they say occurred in relation to their copyright subject matter,” Cobden put to the court.

The case continues. You can follow the case in-full here. For a background on the case, click here.


Day 20: iiNet refuses to play police for film industry
 
 
 
Top Stories
CIO exits as Coles steps up offshoring
Updated: Engages Accenture in Manila; staff to learn of their fate today.
 
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Looking for storage? Seagate has five new small business NAS devices
Aug 22, 2014
Seagate has announced a new portfolio of Networked Attached Storage (NAS) solutions specifically ...
Run a small business in western Sydney?
Aug 15, 2014
This event might be of interest if you're looking to meet other people with a similar interest ...
Buying a tablet? Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 goes on sale this month
Aug 8, 2014
Microsoft has announced its Surface Pro 3 will go on sale in Australia on 28 August from ...
Apple's top MacBook Pro with Retina is now cheaper
Aug 1, 2014
Apple has updated its MacBook Pro range with faster processors and new pricing, including ...
Pass on carbon tax savings, warns ACCC
Jul 24, 2014
The ACCC is warning businesses that supply "regulated goods" to pass on any cost savings ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  71%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 787

Vote