Day 19: Federal Court reserves another day for copyright case

 

Would be “catastrophic” if it didn’t finish this year.

The Justice presiding over the copyright case between ISP iiNet and the film industry has again extended the number of days reserved to hear the case.

Justice Cowdroy agreed to reserve the 24th, 25th and 26th November at the request of the film industry’s barrister Tony Bannon to ensure the matter is concluded this year.

“It would be catastrophic if this matter didn’t finish in the week of the 23rd,” Cowdroy said.

“I think [reserving also the 24th November] is the safest course. A matter like this should be concluded now rather than being parked until next year.”

Bannon had raised concerns that the court may run out of time to conclude the matter based on the number of available days left.

It was expected that iiNet’s closing submissions would consume the next sitting day, Thursday 19th November, and go into the following week.

An application by the Internet Industry Association to enter proceedings as a “friend of the court” was due to be heard on the 26th November.

Although an extra day was pencilled into the court diary, it was understood the matter of timing would be reviewed again at the close of proceedings on Thursday next week.

Day 19 of the case concluded with a case law argument by iiNet’s lead barrister Richard Cobden on what constituted a “substantial portion” of a film, TV show or other copyrighted work.

Cobden also spent a large amount of time running through iiNet’s interpretation of the Sharman case that decided Kazaa’s fate.

The case was adjourned until 19th November at 10.15am.

You can follow the case in-full here. For a background on the case, click here.


Day 19: Federal Court reserves another day for copyright case
"Good point, TruthSphere. It seems that the content corporations like to hide behind their AFACT mouthpiece, so perhaps we should assist the public to know the names of all the involved content ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 4
mck
Nov 16, 2009 12:07 AM
The entertainment industry just doesnt get it.
They think the way technology is making the works (they are in charge of distributing) free means those works are devalued.


"The concept of zero took ages for societies to recognize, let alone understand. ... People who think about economics in terms of scarcity get upset when abundance pushes price down towards zero, as if the economic equation were broken. But if you flip the equation and think of it as a cost of zero, you realize that the trick is to use as much of those abundant goods as possible, adding value to complementary scarcities for which you can charge. Zero doesn't break economics, it just requires a different approach." -- Blaise Alleyne from http://techdirt.com/articles/20091109/1521136859.shtml


iiNet cant be put to blame for the entertainment industry's failure to adapt.
TruthSphere
Nov 16, 2009 5:46 PM
Adapt or die :)
TruthSphere
Nov 20, 2009 8:51 AM
I was just thinking, AFACT as a name is used partly by the content corporations to avoid negative publicity. So I was thinking everytime we mention their name on these articles we should do something like "AFACT (Seven Network etc.)" or "AFACT (Sony Pictures Entertainment etc.), you know pick a random company they represent.
anonymous
Nov 20, 2009 10:13 AM
Good point, TruthSphere. It seems that the content corporations like to hide behind their AFACT mouthpiece, so perhaps we should assist the public to know the names of all the involved content corporations!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Revealed: 2012 e-government award winners
Government highlights projects, professionals of the year.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 480

Vote