Day 18: Studios seek to deprive iiNet barristers of "beauty sleep"

 

Film industry legal team was sleepless in Sydney.

The film industry lead barrister has accused iiNet's legal team of trying to win time for "beauty sleep" by requesting the case be adjourned until Friday mid-morning.

The studios wrapped up almost two days of closing submissions today which the presiding Justice Cowdroy described as "voluminous".

iiNet's lead barrister Richard Cobden told the court his legal team had "considered as much of the material as they were able to" since receiving it yesterday.

"Perhaps in hindsight it would have been better in February or March to set time for evidence and then set some clear time off to have a proper exchange of [closing] submissions," Cobden told the court.

"We will need to adjourn until 11am on Friday to enable us to have at least one clear day to work on the [closing submissions] document."

But the suggestion raised the ire of the film industry's barrister Tony Bannon.

"We submit my learned friend should start tomorrow," Bannon responded.

"We haven't been lulling around in the sun from nine-til-five. Sleep has not been on the agenda in the last few days and that's expected in a case like this.

"We expect they shouldn't get their beauty sleep either."

Bannon submitted a full day off was "rather extravagant".

But Justice Cowdroy said he didn't "think one day was going to make much difference in the long run", albeit that he thought it "imperative that [the] case should not be fragmented more than necessary" as it shaped to run over the course of extra days reserved for hearings in the next fortnight.

"I don't want either party constrained [in preparing their closing submissions]," Justice Cowdroy said.

It was expected Cobden's closing submissions would run into Thursday 19th November and potentially into Wednesday 25th November, currently the final day of scheduled hearings in the copyright case.

Barristers for both sides were expected to discuss the possibility of adding another day - either the 24th or 26th - to proceedings between themselves before making a submission to the Federal Court.

The case was adjourned until Friday at 11am AEST. You can follow the case in-full here. For a background on the case, click here.


Day 18: Studios seek to deprive iiNet barristers of "beauty sleep"
 
 
 
Top Stories
First look: Microsoft Outlook for iOS
[Update] Office productivity suite for iOS completed with Outlook.
 
NewSat defaults on $26m in overdue Lockheed payments
Jabiru-1 satellite build hits further hurdles.
 
IBM denies plans to cut 112k jobs
But admits to further restructuring.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Microsoft Outlook is now on iPhone and iPad: why could this be useful?
Jan 30, 2015
Microsoft today released Office for Android and Outlook for iOS - complementing the other Office ...
Franchisees, here's something you should know about
Jan 23, 2015
You need to know the Code if you are a franchisee or franchisor as the penalties are significant.
Xero users rejoice! Quoting has finally arrived
Jan 23, 2015
It has taken years, but Xero has at last added integrated quoting to its online accounting software.
You can now get a no-contract wi-fi tablet from Telstra
Jan 17, 2015
Telstra has began selling wi-fi tablets out of contract without paying extra for cellular ...
Get your business ready for 2015: mobile payments
Jan 2, 2015
These handy apps from MYOB, Xero and others can reduce your administrative load and improve ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  36%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 3102

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 989

Vote