Day Three: iiNet lawyers link film studios to BitTorrent

 

"Contractual relationships" stay confidential.

Several film studios listed as applicants in the copyright case against ISP iiNet had "contractual relationships" with BitTorrent, counsel for iiNet alleged in court today.

The studios, including 20th Century Fox, Paramount and Warner Bros, had their logos on the BitTorrent.com site, located directly under the 'free download' button for the BitTorrent client.

"A number of major studios who are key applicants in this case have a contractual relationship with BitTorrent," general counsel for iiNet Richard Cobden alleged.

"The agreements I'm told [are] confidential."

Cobden tendered to the court iiNet's version of the process that an ordinary internet user would undertake to get a copy of the BitTorrent client, and then to use it to search for one of the 86 copyrighted works listed in the case.

Users visiting the BitTorrent.com website and clicking to download the software client would see a box directly below the ‘download' button containing logos for a number of major film studios.

Once the user had downloaded the client, BitTorrent thanked and directed them to "search the web for stuff to download.

"Nowhere, despite BitTorrent being in a contractual relationship with these key studios, does the site say ‘By the way, try not to download anything owned by Paramount, Warner or Fox," counsel alleged.

"On the website of a partner of Paramount... nothing says please be careful, don't infringe on the rights of Paramount."

Counsel alleged that links to a torrent for Cloverfield, a film owned by Paramount, was visible "only two screens away from the Paramount logo [on the BitTorrent.com website]".

The links led to Torrent sites including Torrentz and Mininova. No warning was given to users not to use their BitTorrent client to download copyright material from the sites.

Cobden alleged the film industry was "engaged wholeheartedly in the promotion of BitTorrent, the accused vehicle of all the infringements in this case."

In contrast, iiNet had no relationship with BitTorrent, Mininova or any torrent site, Cobden alleged.

"It's important to make clear that iiNet did not develop BitTorrent. IiNet doesn't update... distribute... [or] endorse BitTorrent," he alleged.

"iiNet says that BitTorrent can be misused and indeed internal documents warn people [staff] about that."

The case continues. You can follow the case in-full here. For a background on the case, click here.


Day Three: iiNet lawyers link film studios to BitTorrent
 
 
 
Top Stories
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
Will Nutanix be outflanked before reaching IPO?
VMware muscles in on storage startup in hyper-converged infrastructure.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  70%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 658

Vote