Film industry links ISP's best customers with piracy

 

Declines to explain why?

The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft has claimed that there is a link between ISP iiNet upgrading the service plans of heavy-internet users and the proliferation of film piracy, according to documents filed with the Federal Court.

AFACT declined a request by iTnews to spell out what the link might be, due to restrictions placed upon it by the Court.

"That's the kind of evidence that will come out during the course of the case," a federation spokesman said.

iiNet was brought before the Federal Court in a suit lodged by the federation of film distributors over copyright material being allegedly shared illegally over the Perth ISP's network.

In AFACT's outline of opening submissions - an abridged version of which was released today - it alleged that "through inactivity and indifference, iiNet has ... permitted a situation to develop and continue where users of its internet services are free to engage in infringements of ... copyright".

"It [iiNet] has also encouraged heavy users of its network to upgrade their services, thereby increasing its profits," it read. "In other words, iiNet has allowed a widespread culture of infringement to become entrenched."

The six-page document is a heavily stripped-down version of the 90-page original submitted to the court ahead of the start of its case against iiNet, which begins on October 6.

iTNews understands the omitted pages relate to AFACT's responses to iiNet's evidence.

The court yesterday ruled that this information not be made public prior to the start of the case.

AFACT also alleged that iiNet has "offered encouragement, in various forms, to iiNet users to engage in and continue to engage in infringing acts".

It alleged this went beyond the "implicit encouragement" of continuing to grant internet access to users that AFACT said it had identified as copyright infringers.

AFACT's spokesman was unable to define what other forms of encouragement the film industry alleged iiNet had given its customers to download copyright materials.

A legal spokesman for iiNet told iTnews that "the studios' case, in a particularly inventive manner, suggests that iiNet actively encouraged and authorised its customers to break Australia's copyright laws.

"Extraordinarily, the applicants appear to rely on the fact that iiNet is defending itself against these imaginative accusations as evidence of guilt," he said.

"Any objective analysis of the copyright law infringement reveals that the case sought to be made by AFACT and the movie studios requires a great leap over, and a stretch of, the existing law."

In recent directions hearings, iiNet has maintained that the film industry's evidence against customers should be proven in the courts first, before a decision is made to terminate that customers' internet service.

The court will decide whether it is illegal under the Telecommunications Act for iiNet to act on the evidence of alleged copyright infringement supplied by the film industry - for example, by terminating a customer's account.

Further coverage

ISPs cozy up to Federal Court

 

 


Film industry links ISP's best customers with piracy
"Jeeze "Film Industry" Don't you think it might be possible that the people who are after huge plans might be oh I don't know... purchasing digital content, like steam games that are 4-8 gigs in size?"
By freman
 
 
 
Comments: 7
doctorcain
Sep 24, 2009 3:08 PM
Does the atomic logo in the article pic mean they are in on the scam too?!

OooOOOoooOOOooh!

How dare an ISP give more bandwidth to its customers, rewarding their custom and encouraging future business. Just ghastly.
rycrozier
Sep 24, 2009 3:22 PM
@ the doctor. Changed, just for you! It was time for a new film image...
John
Sep 24, 2009 3:25 PM
This is madness, the cure is worse than the disease, do we really want to usher in George Orwell's world - if AFACT win this it will be a major milestone towards that end.
bcmobile
Sep 24, 2009 3:57 PM
I assume the link is that illegal traffic from iiNet IP addresses go up with the release of new, 'larger' plans. All iiNet has to prove is that legal traffic goes up inline with illegal traffic and the film industry is back where they started.
BrettWinterford
Sep 24, 2009 5:33 PM
@bcmobile - if there is no more to the argument, I reckon you've just about nailed it!
laman
Sep 24, 2009 9:25 PM
AFACT should not simply ask ISP to terminate the customer, it should also provide full investigation report to the customer why it thinks that particular customer is breaking Australia's copyright laws. Customers should allow to provide themselves that they are not guilty.
freman
Sep 25, 2009 11:57 AM
Jeeze "Film Industry" Don't you think it might be possible that the people who are after huge plans might be oh I don't know... purchasing digital content, like steam games that are 4-8 gigs in size?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Meet Westpac's new technology leaders
Engineering realigned under CTO.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Was your 2012 IT budget...




   |   View results
Cut by less than ten percent?
  15%
 
Cut by more than ten percent?
  34%
 
Flat
  27%
 
Increased by less than ten percent?
  7%
 
Increased by more than ten percent?
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 409

Vote
Will you still use DropBox and other cloud storage in the wake of the Megauploads saga?

   |   View results
Yes
  65%
 
No
  35%
TOTAL VOTES: 303

Vote