Don’t make NBN “another Optus”: residents group

 

Sydney suburb urges against HFC rollout repeat.

A community group in Sydney's inner west that prevented Optus from stringing aerial hybrid fibre coaxial cables in its streets has warned the Government not to make the NBN a repeat performance.

The Haberfield Association lodged a late submission [PDF] to the NBN Senate Select Committee that shed light on the difficulty the Government could face if it tries to use aerial cabling over underground ducts to save time and money.

The Association said it had successfully prevented Optus from rolling out aerial HFC cable in Haberfield based on a campaign of submissions and protests between 1995 and 1997.

It had also used a $40,000 heritage grant in 1995 to remove all power poles along its shopping centre and replace them with bundled cabling along the back of shop awnings.

Much of the Association's opposition to aerial cabling was to protect the visual appeal of the suburb, which it described as being based "on garden city principles", an urban planning movement with somewhat utopian roots.

"Power pole methodology gained an artificial lease on life thanks to the Optus rollout, and we are deeply suspicious of any attempt to do the same yet again for NBN," the Association said.

"The community is still paying the cost in tree vandalism [to create cable clearances] and road deaths [from vehicles hitting poles].

"Above all, we say that today we don't want another Optus. The community dislocation and dismay was bad enough in 1995. To do it again in 2010 would be a disaster."

The Haberfield Association did concede power poles may need to be used in some areas of Australia to ensure the NBN was delivered quickly.

But it proposed the use of poles "be a temporary expedience, not an approved mode."

"It should be condoned only in strict circumstance, gained after application and only for time-limited exemption," the Association said.

"This means that a strategy will need to be developed that uses existing power poles only where there is an immediate necessity... and always with a specified sunset clause requiring changeover to underground no later than (say) 2015.

"We were witnesses on the street to how quickly and smoothly Telstra underground cables were installed [in Haberfield]," the Association continued.

"We see no reason why this success should not be replicated for the NBN rollout."

Like this? Try Vigilantes threaten rough justice on aerial NBN cables.


Don’t make NBN “another Optus”: residents group
"Apart from the fact that these fibre optic cables will be put amongst 5+ existing electricity cables - and that if electricity cables are ALREADY underground in a certain suburb, the fibre cables ..."
By Chuq
 
 
 
Comments: 6
djzort
Aug 26, 2009 8:01 AM
All these people achieved by stopping Optus's rollout was preventing themselves from accessing broadband (in the era before DSL), pay tv and more competitive land lines.
cootified
Aug 26, 2009 10:46 AM
I don't see what the problem is? If this community wants the cables underground then put it underground. If it costs the government more to do that, then that community should liable for the cost as per our constitution?...
anonymous
Aug 26, 2009 2:03 PM
The fact that this inner urban group are relying on emotive irrelevancies about tree vandalism and road deaths shows just how weak their arguments are about this subject.

The HFC companies used only existing utility infrastructure and did not add one pole to the streets they used. The tree trimming is done for the power lines because of the voltage involved and has nothing to do with comms cables.
nate.cochrane
Aug 26, 2009 4:24 PM
Presumably NIMBYs who lobby against mobile phone towers, broadband lines and the like sit in the dark, don't use phones and never watch television because they would need to have antennas on their roofs to pick up the signals.
How else do they expect these services to be provided? Or are they saying those outside their leafy enclaves should pay for them?
Tenoq
Aug 26, 2009 4:48 PM
As stated by 'anon', the cables are attached to existing power poles: they don't erect new ones. If this suburb doesn't have power poles, the rollout will be underground. For those that already have aerial power and possibly HFC - you'd be lucky to notice the new cable anyway.
Chuq
Aug 26, 2009 4:57 PM
Apart from the fact that these fibre optic cables will be put amongst 5+ existing electricity cables - and that if electricity cables are ALREADY underground in a certain suburb, the fibre cables will also be put underground - have any of these people considered that the NBN fibre can potentially replace (a) Telstra copper lines (admittedly not visible) (b) Optus HFC cable (c) Telstra HFC cable (d) Foxtel/Austar satellite dishes (e) FTA antennas?
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Vito Forte: A CIO for tough times
Fortescue Metals CIO talks vendor management and innovation.
 
Tech staff spared in ANZ's 1000 job cuts
Cost cutting hits middle management.
 
Telstra shifts BigPond email to Windows Live
All data to be migrated to Microsoft cloud.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Would you be concerned about your business' email data being hosted offshore?

   |   View results
Yes
  83%
 
No
  17%
TOTAL VOTES: 245

Vote