Mozilla complains about IE ballot solution

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Mozilla complains about IE ballot solution
"IE8 is w3c compliant. IE8 is very secure. if windows didn't come with a browser bundled, most new users would find it hard to get hold of one and start using the interwebs. Why, I still remember ..."
By Slatts
 
Aug 20, 2009 6:40 AM
Tags: ballot | default | ie | user | become | browser

Proposal is still biased.

Senior executives at Mozilla have argued that recent proposals by Microsoft to appease European Commission (EC) anti-trust regulators over the unfair bundling of Internet Explorer (IE) in Windows products do not go far enough.

After a series of back and forth moves, Microsoft agreed to present consumers with a ballot screen offering a choice of browsers. Users would then pick one to install as their default browser.

However, Mozilla general counsel Harvey Anderson wrote in a blog posting that modifications need to be made to the ballot screen solution, which the EC seems close to accepting.

Anderson claimed that, at present, the ballot screen will be presented only to "users who have set IE as their default web browser", but nothing is mentioned about those who bought PCs with IE pre-installed.

He also recommended that Microsoft should be forced to work with browser vendors directly in an informal group including the EC to iron out ballot implementation problems and address what Mozilla sees as a bias towards IE in the current solution.

"IE may become the default by being selected. It may also become the default if the user simply ignores the ballot," Anderson wrote. "It may also become the default if the user is unable to figure out how to use the ballot. Finally, it may become the default even if the user expresses a desire to try one of the other browsers but fails to achieve an alternative browser install."

Anderson also expressed concerns that, even if a user chose and successfully installed an alternative browser as default, IE would still "occupy prominent real estate on the Desktop and Start Menu".

"The other browsers do not have this luxury and the advertising opportunity it provides merely through placement," he added.

Any solution must be evaluated over time to determine whether it is making a difference to the market and user behaviour, said Anderson in closing.

"The ultimate success of the proposal, however, will depend on Microsoft's long-term commitment to realise not just the words of the proposal, but its spirit, so a lot still remains to be seen," he wrote.

Copyright © 2009 v3.co.uk


 
Comments: 3
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
hellfire
Aug 20, 2009 10:21 AM
This to me is the most rediculous issue. IE8 is the best and most secure browser available and it is unfair to require Microsoft to provide choices of other peoples browsers. Any competent computer literate person san download and use any browser they wish anyway.So why create confusion for all the rest?
HyRax
Aug 20, 2009 12:29 PM
IE8 is not fully W3C complaint. IE8 is full of security holes. IE8 is a fat bastard of an application. People should not be forced to use a sub-standard browser like that. The fact you've allowed the wool to be pulled over your eyes is testament to why sanctions have been put up against Microsoft.

Windows is a commercial product that people have to pay money for. You're paying for Windows, for not IE and the argument is that the user should not be forced to use IE to browse the web because that creates an environment where developers assume everyone is using IE (remember the fiasco of "this website best viewed under IE" of the 1990's?). Microsoft try and argue that IE is an integral part of Windows - it shouldn't be. It's just a web browser. You should be able to use ANY web browser to view ANY html pages within Windows, not just the Internet. Microsoft needs to stop trying to force people to use one product over another.
Slatts
Aug 20, 2009 6:01 PM
IE8 is w3c compliant. IE8 is very secure.
if windows didn't come with a browser bundled, most new users would find it hard to get hold of one and start using the interwebs.
Why, I still remember downloading my first copy of Firefox with IE6.

hi hyrax, check your info cobber
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
TIO website hit by malware
Weekend malware runs one new process per target machine.
 
Microsoft announces Azure launch date
Australia in second wave of country releases.
 
CBA embarks on "database-as-a-service"
Analysis: How the bank intends to save megabucks.
 

Spotlightthe topics we're following

Latest Comments

"Hahahah...What a joke!! "Conroy had said that it was not possible to apply ISP-level filtering ..."
by gerson Feb 9, 2010 10:39 PM
 
"@@Comments, yes, and history keeps repeating itself. Remember the earlier pr-and-media-fuelled ..."
by anonymous Feb 9, 2010 6:40 PM
 
"I would have paid good money to be in court when that clanger dropped. Could you imagine, the ..."
by Private Citizen Feb 9, 2010 6:23 PM
 
"He is not yet listed on NBN Co. website as part of their team of executives (http://www.nbnco.com..."
by Private Citizen Feb 9, 2010 6:07 PM
 
"That would be the list leaked on wikileaks that the minister denied was the ACMA list. The same ..."
by Private Citizen Feb 9, 2010 5:17 PM
1) HTC Magic16 plans 2%
2) Nokia N9743 plans 9%
3) Nokia E7149 plans 1%
4) Apple iPhone 3GS 16GB30 plans 11%
5) Apple iPhone 8GB42 plans 5%
1) iiNet32 plans 5%
2) Netspace36 plans 11%
3) TPG Internet19 plans 14%
4) Optus33 plans 1%
5) Telstra BigPond30 plans 2%

Mobiles | Broadband | Credit Cards

iTnews

Polls

What is the sweet spot for Apple's entry 16GB Wi-Fi iPad?




   |   View results
$549
  78%
 
$579
  10%
 
$619
  4%
 
$649
  3%
 
$699
  5%
TOTAL VOTES: 381

Vote