Industry group tackles software supply chain attacks

 

Stop malicious code being inserted during development.

Not-for-profit organisation the Software Assurance Forum for Excellence in Code (SafeCode) today announced a new industry-led resource designed to help suppliers prevent software being deliberately compromised during sourcing, development or distribution.

The Software Supply Chain Integrity Framework (PDF) was jointly developed by SafeCode members, including SAP, EMC, Symantec, Microsoft, Nokia and Juniper Networks.

SafeCode said that the framework is designed to address so-called supply chain attacks, in which malicious code is intentionally inserted into software during its development or maintenance.

Secure code development is only one element of software assurance, however, and the software creation and delivery processes must also include integrity controls to enable vendors to deliver uncompromised products, according to SafeCode.

"While SafeCode members have individually implemented software integrity practices, this is the first time that the industry has come together to establish a common framework for ensuring the integrity of software through the global supply chain," said Paul Kurtz, executive director of SafeCode.

"This framework will serve as the foundation for subsequent work aimed at identifying and analysing software integrity best practices, and represents a critical step forward in the industry's efforts to advance software assurance."

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Industry group tackles software supply chain attacks
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 10 lands in Australia
Campaign to get business to upgrade kicks off.
 
NSW to build its own myGov
Service NSW digital profiles available by September.
 
Android bug leaves a billion phones open to attack
Hackers only need phone number to target devices.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  51%
 
Only in special circumstances
  17%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 766

Vote