Libraries object to internet filtering

 

Surge in internet use in Australian libraries.

The Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) remains opposed to internet filtering, despite concerns raised over library users caught viewing pornography.

Speaking at a Senate Select Committee in Canberra on the NBN yesterday, Sue Hutley, Executive Director of the ALIA and member of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy's cyber-safety panel, said she strongly opposed the Federal Government's ISP-level filtering plan. 

"We object to filtering on the basis that it is not completely functioning and certainly at the ISP-level it has not proved to be effective," Hutley told the Senate Select Committee. 

"We believe that training and education of the Australian public sets a greater advantage in terms of funding in relation to internet security," she said. "Libraries and librarians believe that the education and other methods we use provide... open access for Australians". 

ALIA's stance came under fire earlier this month after an elderly man was caught watching hardcore pornography at Maroochydore Library on Queensland's Sunshine Coast earlier this month.

The library did not have a filtering system in place.

Ross Duncan, manager of learning communities and spokesman for the Sunshine Coast Regional Council, told iTnews the council's decision to not filter internet access was based on Library Association guidance.

"We generally take their guidelines or their suggestions very seriously," he said.

Duncan added that complaints by library staff relating to internet access accounts for a very small number of complaints.

"If we look at the estimated frequency, we get almost two million visits per year in our regional library service," he said. "We did a survey of staff and it looks like complaints related to internet access equates to 0.0023 percent of all visits".

Although the Library Association objects to filtering, it notes that 40 percent of Australian libraries currently use a version of a PC-based filtering system funded by the library's local council.

Surging internet use

A recent survey conducted by ALIA found that 147,474 users accessed the internet each week within Australian libraries.

Use of the internet within NSW libraries alone was up 41 percent on previous years.


Libraries object to internet filtering
"Yes Dr, around the central coast. I won't be any more specific."
By Slatts
 
 
 
Comments: 8
ADSLNerd
Jul 21, 2009 5:09 PM
I absolutely agree with this statement "We believe that training and education of the Australian public sets a greater advantage in terms of funding in relation to internet security". Its up to people to educate people as to what should be accessed on the web and what is. Its not the part of the Commonwealth Government to start trying to control what people go to. A net filter is will not fix anything, and will only make people with more abhorrent ideas, to find various ways to access questionable material. In fact a net filter is a subtle way to start cracking down on legitimate material. It wont take long before a dicatorship takes full control. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
anonymous
Jul 21, 2009 5:51 PM
The only people calling for Conroy's Catastrophe are religious fundamentalists who wrongly think it will stop all the nasties, and of course Corporal Conroy who's been told to do it by Captain Rudd so he can harvest some naive Senate and preference votes.

This is the tip of a very nasty iceberg. It will let current and future governments secretly ban any opposing views. The ACL conga line has been tuned up to deny this, but with no public oversight permitted of the process, how could the outcome lead to anything other than absolute corruption?
Psuedo
Jul 22, 2009 4:26 PM
I think in general public libraries should be pushing their internet traffic through a filter. I think that there is a duty of care to younger users to ensure that hardcore porn is not accessible. What about the monitoring of internet traffic and downloads??

I definately don't support the implementation of ISP level filtering. But with the NBN on the cards, what is going to make individual users more personally indentifiable than that!
Slatts
Jul 22, 2009 8:00 PM
I'm with you Psuedo.
Some months ago I was working in a public library. I was shocked to see an older bloke (even older than me) viewing blatant porn on a library computer.
I don't know if I was more shocked by the fact that a normal nondescript 50 something man would view such content on a clearly visible library monitor or that the library didn't filter such content on a computer availably to young children.
Maxxi
Jul 23, 2009 8:46 AM
For anti-filter activists, children are just another "collateral damage" aspect that can be sacrificed so that they can have their "anto-censorship jihad...".
The issue in question here was whether libraries should have internet filtering, not about ISP filtering...

But no, they have to come bleating and complaining again, rehashing the same old bleating and gesticulating again, about ISP filtering... They do not care about the actual subject, it's just always got to be about them and their "jihad"...

"So what if some kids see hard core porn in a library every now an then??? Educating the old geezer watching his porn will fix it..."

What is this continual misinformation that it needs to be either filter or education? Who ever said that we cannot have both?

Just stop thinking only of yourselves for once and respond to this article: Filters in libraries as a public access point??
anonymous
Jul 23, 2009 9:45 AM
The story is about the Australian Library and Information Association "strongly opposing" Conroy's Catastrophe. This is a rational and intelligent approach which recognises that ISP-level censorship does not work and has unintended consequences.

In cases where control over access is felt necessary, the software available to individual computer users is much more effective and can be tailored to local needs.

It seems that for filter fundamentalists, bleating that "children are just another 'collateral damage' aspect" ignores the fact that ISP censorship doesn't work, won't protect kids from exploitation and creates a climate for secret political corruption.
drlinux
Aug 23, 2009 10:19 PM
Hi Slatts,
Just wondering which area the public library was in when you saw the man looking at pornography - was that also in Queensland?
Slatts
Aug 26, 2009 8:37 PM
Yes Dr, around the central coast. I won't be any more specific.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 8: Under the hood
Part One of iTnews' enterprise guide to Windows 8.
 
iTnews on tour: The Executive Summit Series
Join us in Sydney and Melbourne to meet Australia's tech leaders.
 
Meet Westpac's new technology leaders
Engineering realigned under CTO.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Was your 2012 IT budget...




   |   View results
Cut by less than ten percent?
  15%
 
Cut by more than ten percent?
  34%
 
Flat
  27%
 
Increased by less than ten percent?
  7%
 
Increased by more than ten percent?
  16%
TOTAL VOTES: 409

Vote
Will you still use DropBox and other cloud storage in the wake of the Megauploads saga?

   |   View results
Yes
  65%
 
No
  35%
TOTAL VOTES: 303

Vote