Debian accepts Mono applications

  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Debian accepts Mono applications
By Nick Farrell
Jul 3, 2009 6:51 AM
Tags: debian | stallman | linux | ubuntu | warning | mono

Ignores Stallman's warning.

All is not well in Debian land as the venerable free software project has decided to accept Mono-based applications despite a warning issued by GNU guru Richard Stallman.

Debian is just getting ready for the second update of its Linux version 5.0 which goes by the name of Lenny.

What spurred Stallman to speak up is the Mono-based note-taking application Tomboy. He thinks that by sticking the Tomboy package in its distribution, Debian runs a risk of getting sued by Microsoft over its C# and .NET patents.

Mono is the open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET, which is written in its C# language. Mono was bought by Novell in 2003 and supports Linux, Solaris, other Unixes including the BSDs and Mac OS X. It has been used to develop a few Linux desktop programs such as the Evolution email client and Tomboy.

Stallman's concern is that if Debian were to be sued by Microsoft that could threaten downstream desktop and embedded Linux distributions, including Xandros and Ubuntu along with all of their derivatives.

Fortunately everyone still has plenty of time to wave their arms and shout about this problem because the next version of Debian called Squeeze is reportedly still buggier than a tropical swamp.

But if Microsoft was going to bite you'd think its lawyers would have rattled off a few threatening missives after Tomboy was bunged into the GNOME v2.18 desktop two years ago.

Writing in his blog, Stallman argues that making Tomboy a default install package in Debian "leads the [free software] community in a risky direction." He said, "It is dangerous to depend on C#, so we need to discourage its use."

He thinks the problem is not with Tomboy or C# but rather with the danger that Microsoft might someday crack down on its claimed C# patents. If it does, that will "force all free C# implementations underground", he warns.

Microsoft did quite well by pressuring TomTom to settle after suing it over FAT-related patents. Stallman thinks that suing free software developers over C#, and by extension .NET, might be the next logical move in Microsoft's anti-Linux litigation strategy.

theinquirer.net (c) 2009 Incisive Media


 
Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Fujitsu, Unisys detail cloud computing plays
Sleeping giants wake up to cloud computing potential.
 
Telstra shareholders: Give us a fair price
iTnews interviews Telstra shareholders.
 
BT: Functional separation was a success
British regulator and BT boast of the benefits of separation.
 

Spotlightthe topics we're following

Latest Comments

"It's likely that "copyright violation" didn't get lumped in with terrorism and pedophilia by ..."
by anonymous Nov 8, 2009 12:13 PM
 
"While I welcome some real action, I wonder how much policing the government will actually ..."
by deonast Nov 8, 2009 1:12 AM
 
"I don't know what the AFACT lawyer is trying to say, I don't even think he knows what he is ..."
by stevo58 Nov 7, 2009 6:58 PM
 
"haha ur weird..., lets leave it at tht lolz Back to the topic... Telstra Needs to Split at ..."
by scan06disk Nov 7, 2009 6:11 PM
 
"If Telstra is forced to split by Mr Krudd's government, how then does the NBN company get it's ..."
by FLashy Nov 7, 2009 4:34 PM

Polls

What next for Telstra?




   |   View results
Sell HFC cable network and Foxtel stake
  13%
 
Sit out the drama and opt for Functional Separation
  6%
 
Vend all fixed network assets into the NBN
  17%
 
Take the Federal Government to the High Court
  27%
 
Agree to structurally separate
  37%
TOTAL VOTES: 1049

Vote