Phone tax not enough for full broadband rollout

Jul 3, 2009 6:38 AM
Tags: broadband | cent | fibreoptic | per | service | bt

If UK wants 100 per cent fibre coverage.

BT has said that a proposed 50 pence ($1.03) per month levy on phone landlines will not provide enough funds to cover the entire UK with fibre-optic broadband.

However, the company is prepared to guarantee a 15Mbit/s service where fibre-optic is available.

At a briefing to discuss the next phase of BT's fibre-optic rollout today, BT strategy and portfolio group director Liv Garfield said that the levy, proposed in Lord Carter's Digital Britain report last month, would probably not provide enough funds to deliver fibre-optic broadband to the entire country.

"There's a billion pounds on offer here, but the devil's in the detail about which areas will get funded," she explained.

"If you're going from 55 to 85 per cent, then I can see that that could be delivered. I can see a way to get to 80 to 85 per cent with that kind of money, but we will struggle to get to 100 per cent – in fact it would be impossible to get to 100 per cent," she added.

However, in answer to a query regarding service level agreements (SLAs), Openreach managing director for next-generation access David Campbell said the company will guarantee 15Mbit/s, and take steps to remedy the situation if the service delivered falls below this.

Traditionally, carriers have declined to offer service level guarantees on broadband connections, leaving smaller companies to choose consumer-grade broadband offerings or opt for more costly services backed by an SLA.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


  • Email a Friend
  • Print Page
Phone tax not enough for full broadband rollout
 
Comments

Be the first to comment on this article.
Thoughts on this article? Add a comment below.
Comment:
Want to participate in the discussion?
Or log in now to comment
 
 
 
Top Stories
Oracle shuts down open source test servers
Playing nice with the open source community, Larry?
 
Google hosts election debate
Lundy, Fletcher and Ludlam face off on tech policies.
 
Telstra fined $18.5m for exchange access
Kept competitive DSLAM kit out.
 

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
"Now Julia, if only you would promise not to filter the internet in your next term of government ..."
by hsvandrew Jul 31, 2010 9:33 AM
 
"@Nate - my fears are that if we use a national consortium as an interface to international ..."
by heavenlyhaloes Jul 31, 2010 12:41 AM
 
"Did anybody notice that on Apple's website the iPhone is missing the AT&T logo on the top bar? ..."
by brownenicola Jul 30, 2010 10:18 PM
 
"@digger11 - when will you learn just to remain quiet when you don't have all the facts or a ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 7:13 PM
 
"Wakie is right, Digger11 is either an exceptional forum troll or a massive moron. For those who ..."
by Bazwalt Jul 30, 2010 6:51 PM
Polls
Did Google breach the Telecommunications Interception or Privacy Acts during its WiFi wardrive?

   |   View results
Yes. There is no excuse for collecting this data.
  28%
 
No. If your wireless network is unsecured, you have no right to complain
  72%
TOTAL VOTES: 1873

Vote