Wikipedia boots Church of Scientology

 

User-generated encyclopaedia site Wikipedia has formally banned the Church of Scientology from accessing and editing its pages.

A committee of eleven site arbiters voted on Thursday to block all IP addresses connected to the church and ban multiple accounts believed to be used by church members as well as critics of the religion.

"Each side wishes the articles within this topic to reflect their point of view and have resorted to battlefield editing tactics, with edits being abruptly reverted without any attempt to incorporate what is good, to maintain their preferred status quo," the committee said in its decision.

In addition to the ban, Wikipedia will allow administrators to exercise tighter control over activity on entries involving Scientology.

The decision comes after yet another row on the site over the editing and administration of pages connected to the Church of Scientology and its members.

Wikipedia said that the case was the fourth time in as many years that an arbitration committee has had to preside over a case involving Scientology.

Among the accusations in the case were that both church members and critics were repeatedly altering pages with misleading or poorly-sourced information.

Users were also believed to be manipulating the site by signing up multiple accounts which were then used solely to edit articles relating to Scientology.

The Wikipedia episode is the latest in what has been an ongoing internet feud between the Church of Scientology and critics who claim that the group is a dangerous cult.

The most notable online feud erupted between the church and a group of activists known as Anonymous who have held both real-world protests against the church as well as web-based activities.

The church has also found itself at odds with Google and YouTube over the posting and removal of anti-Scientology sites and videos.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Wikipedia boots Church of Scientology
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian Govt to rethink cyber security strategy
Six-year old policy to be refreshed.
 
The failure of the antivirus industry
[Blog post] Insights from AVAR 2014.
 
At the top of her game
A decision to bring digital operations back in-house three years ago has paid big dividends for Tabcorp.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  5%
TOTAL VOTES: 1005

Vote