Conroy mulls review of ACMA blacklist

 

Senator Conroy has revealed the Government is considering appointing a panel to conduct a regular audit of ACMA's blacklist of banned web sites.

Speaking at the Senate Estimates hearing yesterday, the Communications Minister agreed that the ACMA blacklist process requires greater transparency.

"The government is considering options for greater transparency and accountability in respect of the black list," he said.

"We are considering options which could include a regular review of the list by a panel of eminent persons or a parliamentary committee or a review of all URLs by the classification board."

ACMA's blacklist of banned web sites has twice been leaked onto the Internet.

Queried at the Estimates hearing, Nerida O'Loughlin, General Manager of ACMA's Industry Outputs Division admitted that the regulator now suspects the blacklist was leaked via reverse-engineering of a Government-approved Internet filter, as reported by iTnews in March.

The leaked ACMA blacklist contained the URL's (web addresses) of such harmless sites as a Sunshine Coast dog kennel and a Queensland dentist practice, as well as sites containing the photographs of celebrated photographer Bill Henson.

The blacklist, which currently includes some 977 URLs, is set to become much larger with ACMA in conversation with peers in the United States and United Kingdom to consider the sharing of lists.

"We have been in conversation, as you know, with the Internet Watch Foundation and colleagues in the US," O'Loughlin said.

"At this stage we are looking at what processes need to be put in place for those lists to be used, given that they are developed under different laws than in Australia.

"Also, there are some technical amendments that need to be made to the industry code of practice to allow those to flow through to industry."

Shadow Communications Minister Nick Minchin asked Senator Conroy whether the proposed review measures "are subject to any form of consultation" or whether the Government will simply announce the panel in its own time.

"These issues will be considered along with the pilot trial on filtering before the government makes final decisions on the implementation of the new policy," Senator Conroy said.

"I am happy to have suggestions on improved transparency. As I said, if we are moving from the current system to a new system which is more robust, I think it is a reasonable proposition to suggest that there could be more stringent accountability measures."


Conroy mulls review of ACMA blacklist
 
 
 
Top Stories
Toll Group to go Google
Poaches Woolworths project manager.
 
How News Corp's CIO tackled skills in his race to the cloud
What to do when your team’s talents are no longer needed.
 
Photos: How Thodey transformed Telstra
From turbulent Trujillo to Australia's leading telco.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
Microsoft is offering Azure for Disaster Recovery to Australian SMBs
Feb 10, 2015
If you haven't talked to your IT provider about disaster recovery, it might be worth discussing ...
The 2015 Xero Roadshow is on: here are the locations and dates
Feb 6, 2015
The 2015 Xero Roadshow kicked off this week - see where you can attend at locations around ...
Microsoft Outlook is now on iPhone and iPad: why could this be useful?
Jan 30, 2015
Microsoft today released Office for Android and Outlook for iOS - complementing the other Office ...
Franchisees, here's something you should know about
Jan 23, 2015
You need to know the Code if you are a franchisee or franchisor as the penalties are significant.
Xero users rejoice! Quoting has finally arrived
Jan 23, 2015
It has taken years, but Xero has at last added integrated quoting to its online accounting software.
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  35%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 3927

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 1335

Vote