IPv4 space redistribution threatens to disrupt Internet

 

The regional Internet community is debating four separate proposals on how to redistribute IPv4 address space at the Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) 27 meeting in Manila this week.

Four of the seven policy proposals up for debate at the meeting relate to the transfer of already-allocated IPv4 address space, either between resource holders or regional Internet registries (RIRs).

APNIC said it expects "hot debate" over the proposals, which would permit easy transfers of space between resource holders.

The centre currently only permits inter-organisational transfers under very specific circumstances such as following mergers and acquisitions.

Paul Wilson, director general of APNIC, said that while networks are being transitioned to IPv6, the IPv4 protocol would remain an important part of the Internet "for many years".

"Strong demand is predicted to continue long after the free pool of unallocated [IPv4] resources is exhausted," Wilson said.

"There are justifiable community concerns that the remaining free pool of unallocated address space is distributed fairly in accordance with the global and regional community's wishes.

"There is also a recognition that the community would benefit by being able to redistribute address space where needed."

Wilson said that while there was "general community agreement" that the transfer of IPv4 resources will become necessary to facilitate redistribution of unused address space once the free pool is exhausted, the exact procedures and policies were proving far more contentious.

"Some community members believe an ill-conceived or poorly regulated system could disadvantage developing economies, lead to profiteering, or cause a loss of accuracy in the APNIC Whois Database and disrupt the smooth operation of the Internet in the region," Wilson said.

APNIC has been a consistent voice in the region trying to get the majority of carriers and ISPs to take notice of the impending exhaustion of IPv4 addresses.

Back in mid-2008, it accused the industry of implicitly selecting the failure option for IPv6 by not deploying it sooner.


IPv4 space redistribution threatens to disrupt Internet
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  3%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1827

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?