Sydney Water project nets $5m for Patni

 

Sydney Water will continue to outsource application development work to Indian firm Patni as it enters phase three of its long-running business intelligence project.

The utility is said to have just signed off on phase two of the project. The overall aim is to establish a BI competency centre (BICC) capability across the utility.

Both Oakton and Indian outsourcer, Patni Computer Systems, were retained by Sydney Water to oversee and implement the system respectively.

Architecturally, the system consists of Business Objects’ XI r2 at the front-end, Informatica and IBM extract, transform and load (ETL) tools, an enterprise data warehouse (EDW) based on Oracle’s 10g database, and Solaris 10 and Unix as the underlying operating systems.

Sydney Water is also understood to have purchased a generic third-party data model specific to the utility sector from an unnamed U.S. firm.

Patni country manager, Rick Eager, told iTNews that his company had a ‘good working relationship’ with Oakton on the project.

“They gave us a package of work that we would size, spec, analyse and then build,” Eager told iTNews.

Eager said the company was used to working on projects that involved multiple systems integrators for architecture design, planning and implementation.

In the case of Sydney Water, Oakton ran the ‘program office’ and provided technical assurance on all delivery phases.

Eager said Patni has taken ‘more than $5 million’ in revenues from the project so far. The work has been conducted on a fixed cost basis, which Sydney Water is said to have found attractive.

“It made a difference in the tender process for a project of this scale to have a fixed price,” said Ullrich Loeffler, software analyst at IDC and author of a case study on the project.

“We hear so much about these types of projects going over budget.”

A portion of Patni’s work was subject to what could be described as an agile methodology and delivery method – but the additional costs of this process were only partially factored into the overall fixed cost, according to Eager.

“We built in some costs, so there has been an allowance for [the additional cost of] a more iterative development style,” he said.

Part of Patni’s success as an Indian outsourcer working with a government-controlled entity is that it did not try to dictate what portion of work would be offshored, according to Eager.

“We didn’t dictate how the solution should be executed – it was up to Sydney Water’s discretion,” he explained.

“If we’d gone in and said X amount of work has to go offshore, the working dynamic [with Sydney Water] might have been different.”

Most of the work was conducted locally, because ‘BI lends itself to on-site [development] due to the nature of the work’, Eager said.

Patni offshored only one project – where multiple water monitoring reporting systems from the likes of Crystal Reports, TM1, Microstrategy and Microsoft were ‘re-platformed’ to a single J2EE/Struts-based architecture.

Simultaneous to the BICC project, Sydney Water is also said to be undergoing a modernisation project with respect to the underlying hardware.

Sydney Water project nets $5m for Patni
 
 
 
Top Stories
The True Cost of BYOD - 2014 survey
Twelve months on from our first study, is BYOD a better proposition?
 
Photos: Unboxing the Magnus supercomputer
Pawsey's biggest beast slots into place.
 
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  28%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  21%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1082

Vote