Wikileaks back in action after reprieve

 

A US federal court has reversed an order which had shut down the Wikileaks.org website..

The whistleblower site had been ordered to disable the domain after an earlier court ruled in favour of Swiss bank Juilus Baer which complained about leaked documents posted on the site.

Wikileaks was founded as an open forum for the anonymous posting of government and corporate documents.

The site has been host to incriminating documents regarding the Northern Rock crisis, human rights abuses in China, and political corruption in Kenya.

The San Francisco federal court decision overturns the previous ruling in which the site would have been forced to disconnect the wikileaks.org domain, cutting off the site's main URL.

The judge also overturned a restraining order preventing Wikileaks from running any Julius Baer documents on its site.

Defenders of Wikileaks, which included the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, declared the decision a victory for free speech.

"We are very pleased that Judge White recognised the serious constitutional concerns raised by his earlier orders," said Matt Zimmerman, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

"Attempting to interfere with the operation of an entire website because you have a dispute over some of its content is never the right approach."

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  4%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1812

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?