More “bang for buck” for ISPs who jump aboard new undersea cable

 

Internode, iiNet and iPrimus have all jumped aboard PIPE Network’s new $200 million undersea high-speed cable, announcing they will use it to route up to 60 percent of their total Internet traffic and increase customer data allowances.

Unveiled yesterday in Melbourne by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy, the Sydney to Guam Pipe Pacific Cable 1 (PPC-1) has been embraced by iiNet, Internode and iPrimus, who have all signed 15 year agreements as Pipe International Foundation customers.

But even though the PPC-1 system is still 18 months away from completion, Australian ISPs are already penciling big plans for the cable. iiNet has announced it will use the new cable to route between 40 and 60 percent of its international bandwidth capacity, while Internode and iPrimus said they would use the cable for about 40 percent of their total traffic needs.

For iiNet, this will all come at a 15 percent total cost reduction for its international bandwidth costs, according to its CTO, Greg Bader. While Internode and iPrimus did not explicitly detail their expected savings, both ISPs agreed that the savings would be “significant” and would flow on to their respective customers.

"PPC-1 will give us more control over our product and cost base and will give us the ability to now differentiate and innovate," Bader said.

How those savings emerge though, remains to be seen. While the above-mentioned ISPs agreed pricing for plans may not be reduced, Internode, iiNet and iPrimus said that customers would be given more “bang for their buck” in the form of greater data allowances.

“The PPC-1 will significantly reduce the cost of data for us and therefore for our customers,” said iPrimus CEO Ravi Bhatia. “Use of bandwidth intensive application has led to customer data usage growing by about four percent per month, so if we can maintain the prices in the face of higher data usage it is in effect a price reduction.”

Internode managing director, Simon Hackett, was also confident of maintaining current broadband pricing with the promise of increased data allowance for customers.

“We expect this to lead to increases in value for the regular punter, where 'value' here is 'gigs for money',” he said. "[Although] the total expenditure of Internode will rise with the addition of PPC-1 to our circuits in use - however, the 'bang for buck' will significantly improve, meaning that we expect to be able to return additional value to our customers by expanding their download quotas for the same monthly expenditure."

On a larger scale, Hackett also believes the PPC-1 cable will increase the competitive tension in the Asia-Pacific bandwidth market, sentiments shared by PIPE Networks executive director Lloyd Ernst, who spoke at yesterday’s launch.

He said increased competition in Australia’s international cable arena would also assist in breaking up the cable duopoly maintained by Australia-Japan Cable (AJC) and Southern Cross Cable (SXC), both which are partly owned by Telstra and Optus respectively.

"It's not about capacity, it's about competition," Ernst said. "Look at the discount airline model. Australians didn't benefit much from competition when there were only two major airlines. Just like new players in the airline industry, we aim to be the disruptive force that changes the market."

More “bang for buck” for ISPs who jump aboard new undersea cable
 
 
 
Top Stories
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  71%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 762

Vote