Review: Samsung Galaxy S III

 

Samsung’s newest flagship Android smartphone.

View larger image View larger image View larger image

See all pictures here »

The excitement regarding the launch of the Galaxy S III has been intriguing to watch. It’s hard to recall the last time the imminent arrival of a product not made by Apple caused such a buzz in the general community.

Of course, for Samsung there’s the element of the two-edged sword about this excitement: while the carrier and consumer interest is always great for sales, it puts huge expectations on the device and the company.

Smooth design

Superficially, it’s easy to see why the Galaxy S III is generating such interest. The phone builds on the broad appeal of the Galaxy SII, increasing the screen size from 4.3in to 4.8in – a sizeable difference.

The display is a superb Super AMOLED with a 720x1280 resolution, identical to our current A-Lister, the HTC One X. The contrast is excellent and the screen feels very bright, with animations looking clean and crisp. The screen is even fairly readable in bright light, although not great in direct sunlight.

Design cues and touches have been altered as well, with the S III featuring rounded corners, a raised rather than recessed hard home button and a piano-style finish in both the white and blue versions. (We say “blue and white” but the correct terms from Samsung are “pebble blue and marble white”, just for reference.)

The removable back on the S III feels very flimsy and plasticy, sadly, although Samsung says it’s actually polycarbonate. Removing the rear for access to the microSD and miniSIM slots actually feels mildly fraught - as if the back might snap or chip, although it’s certainly an improvement over the SII.

The Galaxy SIII measures 70 x 8.9 x 136mm - quite slim - and weighs in at 132g, putting it under the Apple iPhone 4S in terms of heft. Compared to the One X, it’s almost identical, with HTC’s model 2g lighter and 2mm shorter.

Sitting on either side of the aforementioned home button are capacitive touch buttons for the menu and back functions. It’s worth noting that these are very sensitive and more than once we found ourself backing out of apps by accident.

Powerhouse

Inside, the S III follows the quad core crowd, packing in Samsung’s own Exynos 4212 processor running at 1.4GHz. Backing this up is 1GB of RAM and a Mali-400 GPU. Storage wise there’s a 16GB and a 32GB model available locally.

Putting the SIII through its paces was a humbling experience. In terms of SunSpider it scored 1448.7ms, blisteringly fast compared to the One X’s 2203ms. Quadrant results too were a new record - 5481 compared to the HTC’s 4868. Gaming on the device, via Temple Run, however, didn’t feel quite as smooth as we’d hoped for, although there was certainly nothing that would render the game unplayable.

Much has been made of the Galaxy S III’s hefty 2100mAh battery, and we were certainly impressed although claims that it was double the life of the One X were not backed up by our 24 hour tests. In fact, we found the two to be almost identical, with the S III having 23% left to the One X’s 21%. That said, it’s worth noting that the Galaxy has a removable battery, which the One X does not.

Camera-wise, the S III has an 8MP rear lens as well as a front-facing camera. There’s a burst mode and a “best picture” function that will nominate what the software regards as the “best shot” from a group. Video can be taken at 1080p and the macro functions were quite impressive as well.

Neat features

Samsung has made quite a big deal about some of its native software features, which bear looking at. The S Voice functionality has been built upon from the previous iterations, theoretically allowing for greater voice control. In testing, we found it patchy at best, with the spoken commands to wake up the phone being very hit and miss.

Smart Stay worked much better - this function will turn off the screen timeout as long as it recognises that you’re looking at it, thanks to the forward camera.

Clever use of motion control will also automatically dial any contact you have open when you raise the phone to your ear. However, neither of these functions were enabled by default, causing some confusion and annoyance as to why they weren’t working until we tracked down the correct settings.

Business users may appreciate the inclusion of Polaris Office, which allows users to open Word, Excel and Powerpoint files. According to Samsung, the Galaxy S III supports a "range" of VPN protocols and "virtual desktops, web browsers, [and] SaaS applications", and works with more IT policies than you can poke a stick at.

The Galaxy S III is available on all carriers and the 16GB model is available outright for $899 and the 32GB for $969. This puts it a little above the current outright price of the One X, but with the advantage of also being available on plan for all the major carriers.

Comparing the two handsets across the Optus network, the S III will cost $1220 on the Optus 50 plan over 24 months compared to the One X’s $1200. On Vodafone $59 plan, total cost is $1536 over 24 months for the S III and $1416 for the One X.

In all, Samsung’s Galaxy S III is a truly remarkable handset, matching the built up hype in many respects and surpassing it in many others. A few niggles over the design and the perception of flimsiness to the build don’t stop us from recommending this smartphone as a great Android device.

Copyright © PC & Tech Authority. All rights reserved.


 
Overall Rating
Product Info
Specs:
Screen: 4.8in 720x1280 Super AMOLED Dimensions: 70x8.9x136mm Weight: 132g CPU: Exynos 4 quad-core 1.4GHz Storage: 16GB or 32GB with microSD slot RAM: 1GB GPU: Mali 400 MP
 
Supplier:
 
Price when reviewed:
899
 
 
 
Top Stories
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
Who'd have picked a BlackBerry for the Internet of Things?
[Blog] BlackBerry has a more secure future in the physical world.
 
Will Nutanix be outflanked before reaching IPO?
VMware muscles in on storage startup in hyper-converged infrastructure.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  70%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 646

Vote