Corporate spambots named and shamed

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Fortune 500 companies under the spotlight.

A San Francisco network security company has started a campaign to name and shame corporate networks which host Trojan-infected PCs that send spam.

Support Intelligence has found infected PCs in many of the top companies in the world, including 3M, Toshiba, Bank of America, Borders and ClearChannel.

"We have been collecting data on the top 500 networks in Fortune 1000 companies evaluating how much spam or unsolicited commercial email they send," said the company. "We will continue this coverage until corporate America is clean."

Support Intelligence suggested that it will achieve this by 2012.

The data has highlighted some very poor security systems, even in technology companies.

Toshiba was singled out for particular criticism. Support Intelligence claimed that one of Toshiba's servers has been spewing out share ramping spam and bogus financial offers for over nine months.

By contrast, Borders suffered an infection and sorted it out within four days, and financial services company Charles Schwab was cleared of sending out any spam at all from its servers.

Support Intelligence will be naming companies on its blog for the next three weeks, showing IP addresses to prove its point.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Corporate spambots named and shamed
 
 
 
Top Stories
The CISO’s dilemma: Do you trust your partner’s partner?
[Blog post] How far down the chain do you check?
 
Microsoft confirms Australian Azure launch
Available from next week.
 
NBN Co names first 140 FTTN sites
National trial extended.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
In which area is your IT shop hiring the most staff?




   |   View results
IT security and risk
  25%
 
Sourcing and strategy
  12%
 
IT infrastructure (servers, storage, networking)
  22%
 
End user computing (desktops, mobiles, apps)
  14%
 
Software development
  27%
TOTAL VOTES: 285

Vote
Would your InfoSec team be prepared to share threat data with the Australian Government?

   |   View results
Yes
  60%
 
No
  40%
TOTAL VOTES: 105

Vote