Cisco scales down high-end routing system

 

320Gbps model targets regional data hubs and data peering sites.

Cisco Systems has launched a four-slot version of its flagship Carrier Routing System 1 (CRS-1) router that targets telecoms providers. 

The networking giant has designed its new four-slot CRS-1 for hub locations shared by multiple service operators, as well as regional hubs and data centre peering sites.

Cisco's new units achieve switching speeds of up to 320Gbps. Cisco also offers eight-slot and 16-slot CRS-1 models with maximum speeds of 640Gbps and 1.2Tbps respectively.

The CRS-1 scales up to a maximum throughput of 92Tbps and offers 40Gbps internet connectivity.

It is designed to handle next-generation networking applications including video on demand, internet telephony, data networking and mobile services.

"Extending throughput and capacity that enables high-speed premium services like video and IPTV are service providers' primary objectives," said Tony Bates, general manager of Cisco's Service Provider Routing Technology Group.

"Cisco developed the four-slot CRS-1 in direct response to requests from our service provider customers which wanted to deploy the 40Gbps CRS-1 with a smaller form factor and less capital expenditure per deployment."

BT is standardising its next-generation network infrastructure on the CRS-1, and Cisco said that the operator has been testing the new four-slot models.

The four-slot CRS-1 will be available in November at a starting price of US$160,000.

Copyright ©v3.co.uk


Cisco scales down high-end routing system
 
 
 
 
 
Top Stories
CommBank suppliers compete for portable workloads
Multi-sourcing deals yield $100m savings.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 542

Vote