Amazon breaks out Glacier cloud archive service

 

Low-cost alternative to tape?

Amazon has taken the wraps off its Glacier low-cost archive service, which it claims could act as a viable alternative to using disk or tape libraries for long-term data storage.

The internet giant priced the new service at one cent a gigabyte a month for its US regions, 1.1 cents for its European region and 1.2 cents for its Asia Pacific region, based in Tokyo.

Glacier customers can attach up to 1000 'vaults' to an Amazon account. Within each vault, users can upload an 'archive' of up to 40 Terabytes of data.

The new service beefs up Amazon's cloud storage portfolio, but differs from the existing S3 service in several ways, according to the firm.

"First, S3 is optimised for rapid retrieval (generally tens to hundreds of milliseconds per request). Glacier is not (we didn't call it Glacier for nothing)," Amazon said in a blog post.

"With Glacier, your retrieval requests are queued up and honoured at a somewhat leisurely pace. Your archive will be available for downloading in 3 to 5 hours."

Amazon said it would allow users to retrieve "up to 5 percent of your average monthly storage, pro-rated daily, for free each month". Beyond that, retrieval fees were charged.

"So for data that you'll need to retrieve in greater volume more frequently, S3 may be a more cost-effective service," the firm said.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Amazon breaks out Glacier cloud archive service
 
 
 
Top Stories
The True Cost of BYOD - 2014 survey
Twelve months on from our first study, is BYOD a better proposition?
 
Photos: Unboxing the Magnus supercomputer
Pawsey's biggest beast slots into place.
 
ANZ looks to life beyond the transaction
If digital disruptors think an online payments startup could rock the big four, they’ve missed the point of why people use banks, says Patrick Maes.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
What is delaying adoption of public cloud in your organisation?







   |   View results
Lock-in concerns
  29%
 
Application integration concerns
  3%
 
Security and compliance concerns
  28%
 
Unreliable network infrastructure
  9%
 
Data sovereignty concerns
  22%
 
Lack of stakeholder support
  3%
 
Protecting on-premise IT jobs
  4%
 
Difficulty transitioning CapEx budget into OpEx
  3%
TOTAL VOTES: 1079

Vote