Human Services leads on website accessibility

 

iTnews surveys 23 federal agency sites.

The Department of Human Services’ (DHS) website leads some 22 other federal agency sites in the race to comply with mandatory web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG 2.0) by the end of the year.

iTnews conducted a survey of websites using two independent WCAG 2.0 checkers - the Ontario Government sponsored achecker.ca and Total Validator v.7.4.0. The two results for each agency were averaged, sorted and summarised (see table below).

The top Government sites based on the least number of errors averaged on their home pages were:

  • Human Services (zero errors)
  • Infrastructure & Transport (four errors)
  • Prime Minister & Cabinet (PM&C), the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FAHCSIA) (each with five errors)

Typical errors included anchors without texts, document languages' not being identified, invalid language codes, no alternate texts to images and no text added to a label elements.

DHS communication general manager Hank Jongen said the department developed its site "with strict web standards and best practice in mind."

“We understand the importance of meeting our accessibility requirements and actively promote the value of meeting our WCAG 2.0 commitments," he said.

"We have also ensured that these requirements become part of our standard developer and web authoring practice — rather than treated as a once-off event." 

Australian Governments at all levels endorsed WCAG 2.0 and require their websites (federal, state and territory) to meet new guidelines at the minimum compliance level of Single A by the end of the year.

They are required to meet medium compliance level AA by the end of 2014.

Australian Government agencies generally do a good job with provision of accessible web sites and are far in advance of the private sector, Australian National University lecturer Tom Worthington said.

“Rather than treat this as an extra burden, organisations should use the introduction of the Version 2 accessibility guidelines to review how they provide information to all web users," he said.

"Accessibility guidelines can provide better access for mobile users with tablets and smart phones, without the added expense and complexity of producing apps."

Technical structure

Web management environments varied among the agencies surveyed by iTnews.

Most Government sites relied on a version of ASP.net, SharePoint, Domino or open source PHP/SQL platforms such as Drupal and Squiz.

DHS opted for Documentum as its back-end web content management system, along with specialised web editors such as Adobe's Dreamweaver.

Agencies with Microsoft SharePoint-based sites seem to do it tougher in the WCAG 2.0 checks, with Innovation, Resources, Energy & Tourism (RET) and the Attorney-General’s Department (AG) tending to have more accessibility errors than other sites.

However, SharePoint was technically capable of supporting WCAG compliance activities.

In late July 2010, Microsoft published WCAG 2.0 “A” and “AA” conformance statements for SharePoint Foundation 2010, SharePoint Server 2010, Office 2010, FAST, Office Web Apps, Project Server 2010 & Search Server 2010. 

“These statements re-affirm our commitment to making our software accessible for those who need it. WCAG 2.0 or Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 covers a wide range of recommendations for making Web content more accessible,” a Microsoft Australia spokesman said.

More recently, the association for the visually handicapped, Vision Australia, confirmed that SharePoint 2010 offers “a solid foundation” to achieve accessibility, though it may require some customisation and “governance” for the best results. (pdf)

TABLE: SUMMARY OF WEB ACCESSIBILITY OF HOME PAGES

WCAG 2.0
(Single A)
Avg
Errors
achecker Total Validator Web CMS
DHS 0 0 0 Documentum
Infrastr & Trans 4 2 6 ASP.net
PM & C 5 2 7 ASP.net
DEEWR 5 1 9 ASP.net
DBCDE 5 2 8 Squiz
FAHCSIA 5 4 6 Drupal
ACCC 6 5 6 PHP/SQL
Sustainability, Env. 6 5 7     -
DAFF 7 1 12 Squiz
DoHA 7 8 5 Domino
Finance 7 6 8 ASP.net
APH 8 4 12 ASP.net
Treasury 10 10 9 ASP.net
AG 13 9 16 SharePoint
Immigration 13 12 14 Squiz
DFAT 18 9 26 PHP/SQL
Climate Change 27 17 36 ASP.net
AFP 31 26 35 ASP.net
Defence 31 52 10 ASP.net
ABS 43 34 52 Domino
RET 76 139 13 SharePoint
ATO 138 33 243 ASP.net
Innovation 176 333 18 SharePoint
* Checked on 16 July with achecker.ca and Total Validator v 7.4.0

 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Human Services leads on website accessibility
 
 
 
Top Stories
CIO exits as Coles steps up offshoring
Updated: Engages Accenture in Manila; staff to learn of their fate today.
 
Matching databases to Linux distros
Reviewed: OS-repository DBMSs, MariaDB vs MySQL.
 
Coalition's NBN cost-benefit study finds in favour of MTM
FTTP costs too much, would take too long.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest articles on BIT Latest Articles from BIT
This 4G smartphone costs $219
Sep 3, 2014
It's possible to spend a lot less on a smartphone if you're prepared to go with a brand you ...
Looking for storage? Seagate has five new small business NAS devices
Aug 22, 2014
Seagate has announced a new portfolio of Networked Attached Storage (NAS) solutions specifically ...
Run a small business in western Sydney?
Aug 15, 2014
This event might be of interest if you're looking to meet other people with a similar interest ...
Buying a tablet? Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 goes on sale this month
Aug 8, 2014
Microsoft has announced its Surface Pro 3 will go on sale in Australia on 28 August from ...
Apple's top MacBook Pro with Retina is now cheaper
Aug 1, 2014
Apple has updated its MacBook Pro range with faster processors and new pricing, including ...
Latest Comments
Polls
Which is the most prevalent cyber attack method your organisation faces?




   |   View results
Phishing and social engineering
  71%
 
Advanced persistent threats
  3%
 
Unpatched or unsupported software vulnerabilities
  11%
 
Denial of service attacks
  6%
 
Insider threats
  10%
TOTAL VOTES: 796

Vote