Vic Human Services stuck with 'ad-hoc' info management

 

Government rejects $8 million project.

The Victorian Department of Human Services had an $8 million-plus electronic record management system proposal knocked back, despite evidence that inefficient practices were hampering freedom of information requests.

The department's corporate services division submitted a funding proposal for an electronic document and records management system (EDRMS) to the state government in May 2011.

An audit report released today shows that $8.16 million was sought initially along with yearly funding of $448,000 to "establish and maintain" the system.

"The request for funding was denied," the auditor-general noted.

Auditor-general Des Pearson noted that "factual inaccuracies in the business case" may have contributed to the proposal being knocked back.

But he criticised the state government's rejection of the proposal, from the perspective that the system could improve information management by the department and solve problems with producing data for FoI requests.

"The storage and management of records affects agencies' ability to locate information in response to FoI applicants' requests," he said.

The EDRMS project was proposed after internal estimates by the department that 90 percent of its documents "are not properly managed as records".

"Since DHS does not have a robust record keeping system, records are stored in network drives, hard drives, portable devices and emails," Pearson noted.

"Records that have not been managed in accordance with better practice are difficult to locate, requiring more resources to search for them.

"In some cases these records cannot be located."

Despite apparent shortcomings in the business case for the EDRMS system, Pearson said it correctly indicated "that DHS lacks a strong information management culture, and manages its information in an ad hoc and inconsistent manner."

"An EDRMS can improve access to information, safeguard the corporate memory and minimise the risk that documents are lost as a result of a disaster or movement of staff," he said.

Paper in same boat?

Although not related to long-term storage of digital records, Pearson cited an example of physical records relating to 'wards-of-the-state' as an example of the far-reaching problems experienced by DHS in turning up documents to resolve freedom of information requests.

Wards are "people who were removed from their families and placed in government or church operated orphanages, children's homes or foster care as children".

For years, subsets of ward data have been considered "not in existence" or unable to be located to satisfy FoI requests.

Pearson did not specifically refer to the need to digitise such paper records.

However, he did call for improvements to physical storage of documents, such as a climate control system to stop deterioration, and better indexing for search purposes.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Vic Human Services stuck with 'ad-hoc' info management
An example of a basic Department of Human Services’ record index. Credit: Victorian Auditor-General
 
 
 
Top Stories
The CISO’s dilemma: Do you trust your partner’s partner?
[Blog post] How far down the chain do you check?
 
Microsoft confirms Australian Azure launch
Available from next week.
 
NBN Co names first 140 FTTN sites
National trial extended.
 
 
An example of a basic Department of Human Services’ record index. Credit: Victorian Auditor-General
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
In which area is your IT shop hiring the most staff?




   |   View results
IT security and risk
  25%
 
Sourcing and strategy
  12%
 
IT infrastructure (servers, storage, networking)
  23%
 
End user computing (desktops, mobiles, apps)
  14%
 
Software development
  27%
TOTAL VOTES: 279

Vote
Would your InfoSec team be prepared to share threat data with the Australian Government?

   |   View results
Yes
  62%
 
No
  38%
TOTAL VOTES: 98

Vote