Huawei puts cap on Iran business

 

No more new customers.

Chinese networking giant Huawei will put a cap on its business development plans in Iran following criticisms that its technology was used by the Middle Eastern government to locate dissidents.  

Huawei announced on Friday that it would "restrict its business development there by no longer seeking new customers and limiting its business activities with existing customers". 

The move is in line with earlier commitments by networking rivals Ericsson and Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) to curb new sales in Iran.

The three companies provide infrastructure to Iran's second largest mobile carrier, MTN Irancell. 

NSN supplied a monitoring centre to Iranian carrier MTN Irancell in 2008 but in 2009 divested its monitoring operations and has since committed to not growing its business there further.

Ericsson also sold a mobile positioning system to MTN but in 2010 said it would no longer sell new gear there. 

An NSN spokesperson claimed that its interception equipment had since been replaced by Huawei's gear.

The Chinese vendor denied selling censorship equipment to the company, Bloomberg reported last month. 

The statement from the Chinese vendor comes as it continues to fight the perception in the US that its technology poses a national security risk and faces pressure from US lobbyists that oppose Iran's nuclear program.

Huawei has rapidly grown its activities in Iran over the past two years with its headcount standing at just under 1,000, the Financial Times reported.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Huawei puts cap on Iran business
 
 
 
Top Stories
Windows 10 lands in Australia
Campaign to get business to upgrade kicks off.
 
NSW to build its own myGov
Service NSW digital profiles available by September.
 
Android bug leaves a billion phones open to attack
Hackers only need phone number to target devices.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Should law enforcement be able to buy and use exploits?



   |   View results
Yes
  14%
 
No
  50%
 
Only in special circumstances
  17%
 
Yes, but with more transparency
  18%
TOTAL VOTES: 740

Vote