WikiLeaks host builds armoured data centres

 

Perfect for Hobart, says manufacturer.

Should a data centre focus purely on function, or should it be an aesthetically-pleasing place to work?

Jon Karlung, chief executive of Modular Data Centers Stockholm, believes its the latter.

Containerised data centres produced by the likes of IBM, Dell and HP are ugly, unsafe, and offer workers cramped spaces, Karlung told iTnews.

Karlung's firm attempts to incorporate interior design and ergonomics into its data centre solutions. 

"We have abandoned the container concept all together with one exception - parts of our modules can be transported in ISO 40 feet standard trucks," he said.

"The space is entirely built with co-location in mind. It is possible to have people in their working at great comfort, and flexibility."

Remember to sign up to our Cloud Cover bulletin for the industry’s definitive digest on everything-as-a-service.

The entrepreneur's other business, ISP and data centre operator, Bahnhof, made Australian headlines last year when Julian Assange transferred the hosting of WikiLeaks to Bahnhof's Vit Bergen (White Mountain) data centre in Stockholm, after Amazon Web Services unceremonially  site off its servers. 

White Mountains' former life as a nuclear bunker (it was called a "James Bond villain" data centre in some reports) was used to market its physical security benefits.   

A similar aesthetic and marketing approach is being used for MDC. The company's 72 square metre basic module "MDC M1" has some of the characteristics of a standard container, but sheds its boxiness when attached to the circular "command module" (pictured). The outer shell is also constructed using armored Armox 500T metal plates made by Swedish Steel AB.
 


"We use a special armoured steel. War is no risk, but try to convince any normal customer to put valuable stuff like business critical solutions in fragile normal containers of thin plate," says Karlung. 

 

He admits the first design goal was to "make stuff look cool". The command module boasts 750 kilogram pneumatically opened doors -- inspired by the British sci-fi series Space:1999 but built for security purposes, MDC claimed in a proposal.

MDC's proposed "large module", which includes 15 command consoles and 30 M1 units, could be built for €87 million, the company claimed, less than half of the estimated €350 million to build Facebook's proposed Luleå site in the north of Sweden.  

The first prototype is expected to be launched next spring in Stockholm's tech hub, Kista.  

The entreprenuer claims to have interest from "one major international company" to build a gigantic modular data centre, but he would also like Australian partners. 

"Our project would be great in Hobart, Tasmania," he said. "This would give an excellent spot for a major modular data centre. Why? Because I assume that you have cheap land, and also a cooler climate than the continental Australia." 

"Our project has advantages in reducing power needs if you have cold climate - but they still work in hot as well, but then you have to use more conventional active cooling."

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


WikiLeaks host builds armoured data centres
MDC's Command Module, under construction in England.
 
 
 
Top Stories
NSW Govt gets ready to throw out the floppy disks
[Opinion] Dominic Perrottet says its time for government to catch up.
 
iiNet facing new copyright battle with Hollywood
Fighting to protect customer details.
 
The CISO’s dilemma: Do you trust your partner’s partner?
[Blog post] How far down the chain do you check?
 
 
MDC's Command Module, under construction in England.
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
In which area is your IT shop hiring the most staff?




   |   View results
IT security and risk
  25%
 
Sourcing and strategy
  12%
 
IT infrastructure (servers, storage, networking)
  22%
 
End user computing (desktops, mobiles, apps)
  15%
 
Software development
  26%
TOTAL VOTES: 310

Vote
Would your InfoSec team be prepared to share threat data with the Australian Government?

   |   View results
Yes
  58%
 
No
  42%
TOTAL VOTES: 118

Vote