Samsung not buying HP's PC business

 

PC boss Todd Bradley says he will run it no matter what.

Samsung Electronics has flatly denied rumours it planned to buy HP's PC business.

"The recent rumours that Samsung Electronics will be taking over Hewlett-Packard Co.'s personal computer business are not true," the South Korean electronics giant said on its Samsung Tomorrow blog.

"We hope this clarifies any confusion that may have occurred."

The rumours stemmed from a Tuesday article by Taiwanese hardware pulse, DigiTimes, which claimed sources said Samsung was seeking a Taiwanese supplier to outsource its notebook manufacturing to, with additional claims it was eyeing HP's PC business.

Meanwhile, if any company were to buy HP's $40 billion a year PC business, its current executive vice president and former Palm CEO, Todd Bradley, has said he would like to stay.

In an effort to quell rumours that he was seeking an exit from HP, Bradley told CNBC that if the Personal Systems Group were spun out, "it would be my intent to lead that."

"If it stays within HP, I plan to continue to run it," he said.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Samsung not buying HP's PC business
Tags
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1780

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?