Defence forced to revise printer tender

 

Call for Canon printers breached Federal procurement guidelines.

The Defence Materiel Office will reissue its request for tender for Canon PIXMA iP100 printers to comply with Commonwealth procurement guidelines (CPG).

Division 2, sections 8.47-8.49 of the guidelines bars agencies from prescribing a particular trademark or trade name, patent, copyright, design or type, specific origin, producer, or supplier, unless there is no other sufficiently precise or intelligible way of describing the requirement.

Contrary to the CPG, Defence sought bids for a specific brand and product - Canon PIXMA iP100 - in its open tender performance specifications.

Defence intends to procure at least nine such Canon iP100 printers, according to its spokesperson.

Furthermore Defence's RFT classified the Canon PIXMA iP100 as "essential" and that a failure for tenderers to offer this specific product meant their bids will be "excluded from further evaluation".

Alerted to the CPG breach by iTnews, a Defence spokesman said 99 percent of the contract's value was for a military standard ruggedized printer.

Those military standard units were exempted from the CPG under chapter 1.2 of the Defence Procurement Policy Manual, he said, and the PIXMA iP100 was the “only suitable in-service product that has been certified for use to support the overall requirement”.

But the request for tender also called for a Canon PIXMA iP100 commercial grade bubble inkjet printer, expected to represented one percent of the total value of the requirement.

Without an elaborated exemption the RFT would breach the Government’s mandatory procurement guidelines.

Defence informed iTnews the tender would be updated to ensure its exemption from Division 2 of the CPGs is clearly reflected within the Conditions of Tender.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Defence forced to revise printer tender
Canon PIXMA iP100 product shot
 
 
 
Top Stories
Innovating in the sleepy super industry
There’s little incentive to be on the bleeding edge, so why is Andrew Todd fighting so hard?
 
How technology will unify Toll
The systems headache formed through 15 years of acquisitions.
 
Immigration breached Privacy Act with data leak
Pilgrim slams "copy and paste" of asylum seeker data.
 
 
Canon PIXMA iP100 product shot
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  38%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  7%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  15%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  5%
TOTAL VOTES: 842

Vote