Feds quietly close mandatory internet filtering branch

 

But remains committed to mandatory filtering regime.

The former branch head responsible for mandatory, ISP-level filtering in the Department of Broadband (DBCDE) has seen his branch abolished and now leads another area, according to its most recent organisational chart.

The head of the department's Content Program Branch, Lachlann Paterson, formerly responsible for mandatory ISP-level filtering, now heads the Department's Regional & Indigenous Communications Branch.

ITnews understands there are only two remaining members of the former Content Program branch.

They have been transferred to the Cyber Security and Asia Pacific Engagement Branch, led by Sabeena Oberoi.

The reorganisation was triggered by the Government’s scrapping of optional wider filtering programs worth $9.8 million, which was disclosed in last month’s federal budget.

A spokesman for Communications Minister Senator Conroy rejected suggestions that the abolition of the branch signalled any reversal in the Government’s desire to introduce mandatory, ISP-level filtering.

“Within a broader restructure, responsibility for technical aspects of ISP filtering have been moved to the Cyber Security and Asia Pacific Engagement Branch while broader online content and classification matters are looked after by the Cyber Safety and Trade branch within the Department,” the spokesman said.

The spokesman said that the Gillard Government remained committed to the introduction of mandatory, ISP-level filtering of refused classification (RC) content following a review of the National Classification Scheme.

A source told iTnews that the departmental reshuffle reflected its decision to support industry self-regulation to advance cybersafety generally.

Even if mandatory, ISP-level filtering of RC material proceeded, the source said many families would expect to receive some guidance on the appropriate tools for filtering out other forms of inappropriate content.

It was understood that increased support for education, research and support for families could be a recommendation by the Joint Select Committee on Cybersafety.

The Committee was unlikely to endorse ISP-level filtering in its report, due out next week.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Feds quietly close mandatory internet filtering branch
Pic of Ministerial entrance to Parliament House
"@ Rossyduck, A few more facts: I'm pretty sure the majority of those potential customers in your "8o% Land Mass areas restricted to wireless" won't be too upset...not many kangaroos are into ..."
By grump3
 
 
 
Comments: 11
DJ
Jun 16, 2011 3:38 PM
Another Gillard Govt disaster buried.

It joins the others....
Pink batts, solar panels, cash for clunkers, carbon tax, same gender marriage, boat people, mining tax, NBN and about 10BN wasted taxpayers funds on other crap that didn't work or was quietly swept under the rug.
meski
Jun 16, 2011 4:22 PM
Got to love the way you include disasters with successes. None of us really wanted the mandatory filter. OTOH, all of us want an NBN.

< /troll feeding exercise >
grump3
Jun 16, 2011 5:43 PM
Fully agree meski. The filter cost Labor 4 votes from this household.
rokotov
Jun 17, 2011 7:28 AM
Soon NBN will be added to that list. And as the most expensive disaster. And filtering will not go away. Once Labor kill the competition among ISPs they will introduce filtering in their NBN monopoly. For the sake of "working families" of course.
scooter
Jun 17, 2011 12:09 PM
I battled with myself trying not to post but lost.
You people that bag the NBN show an incredible lack of vision. Ohh Business will provide the answers and solutions ... well to date they have not because they are not in it for public benefit. They are in it for the money. What you myopic fools need to realise is that money is not the justification for everything. If that was the case we would have dirt tracks near our houses and bitumen between the warehouses and shops. very much like the broadband of today.
And please don't trot out wireless broadband. There is not enough spectrum to support universal access and the contention on available spectrum would bring it to its knees.
Wake up and smell the roses my cerebrally challenged friends. This is the greatest investment in this nations economy in the last 50 years and should be supported as such.
Let the flame war begin!!! But please try to use fact not emotion as valid arguments.
Rossyduck
Jun 17, 2011 2:49 PM
if we are talking facts ....
Quigly was telling the JCNBN that he was putting wireless every where except on the narrow coastel strips of Australia. Geographically it looks to be 80% coverage....

Quigly was telling us that it was too expensive to be breaking out of the Fibre through Julia Creek and that cost did matter, while at the same time overbuilding the existing networks.

Business have over 400000 connected fibre customers (excluding Telstra) and NBN Co called them in to provide the network in Tasmania, although Government has legislated against those same busineses and are trying to convince us that they are not capable of doing the work.

Soon we will be told that the internet can't work because it is made up of multiple disparate competing networks ....maybe why that is why it works ...

What next - foodco as a government operated wholesaler outlawing private farms and forcing Woolies/ Coles to buy their retail goods (they will be allowed to brand them). Didn't they try thst in the old east european smokestack countires ?
IfYousFeedMe
Jun 17, 2011 5:17 PM
> It joins the others.... Pink batts, solar panels, cash for clunkers ...
Popeye's strategy - if you repeat it often enough, people will take notice. Anything a little more creative?
anonymous
Jun 17, 2011 7:34 PM

No need to be more creative, @IfYousFeedMe, you and Rossyduck seem to be doing quite well in that department from your respective directions, as well as getting completely off topic here.

And Rossyduck, it may be a good idea to write Mike Quigley's name correctly, otherwise people may wrongly get the impression that you sound ignorant.
;-)
HubertCumberdale
Jun 17, 2011 8:51 PM
rokotov wrote:
Soon NBN will be added to that list. And as the most expensive disaster.

False.

rokotov wrote:
And filtering will not go away.

Just think if the coalition opposed the filter as much as the NBN people might respect them.

rokotov wrote:
Once Labor kill the competition among ISPs

Serious question how does one achieve this with a wholesale-only open-access data network?

rokotov wrote:
NBN monopoly.

Government monopoly on communications infrastructure you say? Oh noes the sky is falling... didn't seem to worry anyone when it was Telecom.
Rizz
Jun 18, 2011 3:36 PM
In relation to filtering, it seems it is universal and across the political divide...

Filtering/censorship is being looked at/introduced/occurring in countries with Labor or Conservative rule worldwide (just look at NZ and UK).

So regardless of whether we have Labor or Coalition in government, don't think one is better than the other.

http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/cens3.html
grump3
Jun 19, 2011 12:12 AM
@ Rossyduck,

A few more facts:
I'm pretty sure the majority of those potential customers in your "8o% Land Mass areas restricted to wireless" won't be too upset...not many kangaroos are into Facebook or porn.

Copper has had it's day. It is not up to modern communications requirements & there is no way Private Enterprise will supply ordinary households with a fibre connection...similar situation as applied to transport.
P. Enterprise will build your Toll roads but not interested in suburban streets. That's a job for the Government as per the NBN.

Even for phone communications fibre is far superior to our aging copper:
Doesn't short out due to moisture/water & fail due to rain (like our local phones)

No line interference & crosstalk/buzz

Lower power consumption, so fewer Greenhouse Gasses.

Safe to use during thunderstorms, no possibility of a power surge blowing up your phone or modem.

My only complaint regarding Labor's NBN plans is Conroy"s proposed filter!
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
CommBank suppliers compete for portable workloads
Multi-sourcing deals yield $100m savings.
 
Australia turns to homegrown drones
Debating the finer points of unmanned aerial vehicle design.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
Pic of Ministerial entrance to Parliament House
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 529

Vote