Fake Cisco spruiker faces lengthy jail term

 

Cisco's war on fake stuff continues.

The head of a US-based counterfeit racket that exploited Cisco's brand faces years in jail after being convicted for money laundering and customs abuses.

The leader of the operation, Chun-Yu Zhao, altered Cisco products by using pirated software and creating labels and packaging to mislead consumers, according to a statement by the Justice Department

Zhao sourced the computer networking equipment from a Hong Kong-based company, Hon Tong Technology, which she had operated with her family. 

The customer face of the company’s US operations was Virginia-based company, JDC Networking Inc, which sold the fake gear to customers. 

Zhao had amassed sizable assets from the operation, with a jury asked to decide whether she should forfeit two Porsches, one Mercedes, bank accounts containing over US$1.6 million and seven properties worth US$2.6 million.

JDC’s website continues to offer to buy and refurbish old Cisco, Juniper and Extreme Networks equipment, however its “Current Cisco Items” page is inactive.  

Zhao will be sentenced on August 26 and faces two 20 year prison sentences a piece for each count of money laundering and importing improperly declared goods, and a further 10 years on each count of trafficking in counterfeit goods. 

She’s the second person in May to have been convicted for running an operation that exploited Cisco’s brand. 

Earlier this month, the leader of a warranty scam which targeted Cisco was sentenced to seven years prison and ordered to pay half of an US$18 million restitution fee

Cisco has waged a long campaign against counterfeiters, tapping law enforcement to stamp out the business, according to Dave Walters, Cisco's director of global business operations for brand protection.

Walters pointed to 30 convictions in 2010 and related networking equipment seizures valued at over US$143 million as part of Operation Network Raider, which followed Operation Cisco Raider.  

One of the convicted, a Saudi citizen living in the US, had purchased counterfeit Cisco Gigabit Interface Converters from an online store in China and intended to sell them to the US Department of Defense to support personnel operating in Iraq. 

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Fake Cisco spruiker faces lengthy jail term
"How long or short a sentences is, or how much a fine is has nothing to do with it @btone. When a law is passed, and someone or a group or a company breaks that law, then they must be held ..."
By Ace
 
 
 
Comments: 5
djzort
May 30, 2011 12:59 PM
its awesome when tax dollars are used to enforce the earnings of huge companies - the same companies that avoid actually paying taxes by bouncing money between foreign states ;)
Ace
May 30, 2011 2:17 PM
So @djzort, it is OK to break the law as long as it only affects 'huge' companies? (Although, I'm not sure what you mean by 'enforce the earnings') I was under the illusion that if you broke the law, you had to pay the consequences no matter who the victim was.
btone
May 31, 2011 5:57 AM
I dunno Ace, child molesters and rapists get a few years, this character scores 2 x 20 for counterfeit software. Its not your advocating a 'do the crime, do the time' simplistic principle, its the inconsistency of the sentences that grates with reasonable folks.
Maxxi2
May 31, 2011 10:01 AM
*Could* face up to a maximum 2 x 20 years for the charges convicted btone.

Not like the possible jail terms were hidden from them when they embarked on their enterprising spree mate.

If you know the penalty and still do the crime, then be ready to do the time...

Simple.

BTW: What is the potential maximum jail term for a rapist in that specific state in the USA? Varies so much all over the place, can sometimes be hard to compare. And you cannot compare the pissant jail terms for offenders in Oz to jail terms in some USA states...
Ace
May 31, 2011 3:57 PM
How long or short a sentences is, or how much a fine is has nothing to do with it @btone. When a law is passed, and someone or a group or a company breaks that law, then they must be held accountable. @djzort appeared to be complaining that someone made millions fraudulently, but it shouldn't be a crime because the victim was a 'huge company'. As far as I know, that is not how laws tend to work.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote