Five reasons your product isn't a cloud

 

Some handy tips for IT industry marketers.

You call it marketing, we call it cloud-washing.

Late last year, analyst group Gartner identified that cloud computing had hit the ‘peak of inflated expectations’ in its annual hype cycle.

In the months since it has hit fever pitch, with marketers itching to work 'cloud' into their product pitch, even if it has to be wedged in with a crowbar.

It’s only a matter of time before the term plummets into the ‘trough of disillusionment’.  We thought we might step in early to delay the inevitable.

Ladies and Gentleman, my top five reasons why your product isn't 'cloud'.

5: It's a box. Clouds aren't square, man.

If your product is a physical product purchased via capital expenditure, it's not cloud. Cloud is all about access over a network, not running a server under my bed.

Every one of the major server and storage vendors are guilty parties here. IBM offers the ‘IBM Smart Business Storage Cloud’ – which amounts to a “scale-out” storage system.

Or if you’re EMC, you throw in an API to connect your storage array to Amazon and you’re suddenly selling a “cloud storage platform.”

HP sells a ‘CloudSystem’, Oracle offers ‘the Exalogic Elastic Compute Cloud’, or as Larry likes to call it, “a honking big cloud-in-a-box”:

Dell tried to patent the term ‘cloud computing’ –and were denied. They have since settled for ‘servers optimised for the cloud’. Far more sensible.

4: Not only is it a box, it’s a very small box.

Your box also doesn’t appear to be very big.

Cloud assumes scale, dynamically, both up and down, as I need it.

Whilst we could point the finger at a lot of smaller hosting companies on this score, the consumer storage vendors are an easier target.

Try the Iomega 'Personal Cloud' range. It's basically just a server under your desk plugged into the internet. This product is so egregiously not cloud that their website copy says as much:

"Unlike public and private cloud applications, the Personal Cloud is completely self managed".

Meaning you run it yourself, at your house.

Just about anything billed as 'personal cloud' falls afoul of this one, but let's also pick on TonidoPlug and PogoPlug. Once again, website copy contradicts the cloudy marketing: "TonidoPlug is a tiny, low-power, low-cost personal home server and NAS device".

I already have a surprising number of those, and when I want to make them bigger, I buy bigger hard-drives every few years. With these plugs, scaling up means buying more plugs, while scaling down means... well, throwing them away, I suppose.

3: Self-service doesn't mean ringing you myself.

If I have to call your service desk to order, buy, stop, pause, upgrade or downgrade my service, it's not cloud. It’s hosting, as it always was.

Many of the ‘enterprise clouds’ being built in Australia still haven’t got over this hurdle.

These services feature few of the self-provisioning smarts consumers have come to enjoy.

And can I also point out that the same goes with these so-called 'private' clouds that live inside large organisations. If you have to deal with a helpdesk to get a server, then you don't have a cloud. You have regular IT with a different billing model, at best.

2: It comes with a three-year license.

Cloud means as-a-service, which means "pay-as-you-go". I can stop any time, and I stop paying straight away. You don’t buy a three year license for your water bill.

Oracle's partnership with Amazon Web Services is a curious example.

Oracle have teamed up with Amazon to slap cloud branding on Oracle's software. You can run up Oracle on an EC2 instance, but you still pay per socket as if they were physical servers. You'll also want to carefully read the fine print about the limitations on scale Oracle impose.

But my main point is that Oracle aren't the ones providing the cloudiness here. For mine, its just regular Oracle licensing on EC2 instances.

Meraki also offer something called an "Enterprise Cloud Controller" that has a one, three and five year license. 'Cloud controlled' is all over their website, and seems to them to mean "software uses a network to administer our devices". Just like every network product sold in the last couple of decades. Except when you check the FAQ, it says that if you stop paying for the software, your hardware (that you purchased) stops working.

This is just regular time-limited licensed software with a product key. Not cloud.

1: It’s your regular product. Just Add 'Cloud'

If it's just your regular product with 'cloud' added to the name, it's not cloud. This is cloud washing at its most extreme.

Take Trend Micro's Titanium Anti-Virus product. It has 'cloud technology', which means it apparently "delivers advanced cloud protection, blocking threats in real-time before they reach you."

What it actually means is Trend Micro have a bunch of infrastructure they use to define virus signatures that you download. The same thing they've done for years. Only now they call their infrastructure a 'cloud'. Your PC still has to get the virus signatures, scan all your files, and run their software resident.

At least with some of the products above there's some light fog involved. But when it’s just a re-badge of what you already offer, you might be safer calling it ‘vapour’.

What are some other examples of cloud-washing you’ve seen in the vendor brochures?

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Five reasons your product isn't a cloud
Time for some clarity on vendor marketing claims.
"And I'd never take the advice of a journo who's only been to press conferences and read marketing hype with no experience in implemenation to what 'cloud' is. I'm with @Brett. Cloud has been long ..."
By dawesi
 
 
 
Comments: 12
vcirrus
May 20, 2011 8:52 AM
Sadly this debate continues. I just looked back to my blog post on the topic in Nov 2009 and I reckon I was pretty slow off the mark - http://j.mp/izgkLR.

The truth is that you can define cloud how you like but it's only your perspective. There are many older definitions of cloud and many more flexible definitions. Sure, some vendors are just cloud-washing, but others are genuinely cloudy products despite not fitting into your narrow definition.

But you are right about one thing ... "the cloud" won't have any meaning soon. It is already going back to its earlier definition of "anything we can't or don't need to see into" or the slightly more modern definition "the Internet."

The cloud is dead, long live the cloud.
David Havyatt
May 20, 2011 9:01 AM
Love it. We could engage in the meta-question...why do marketers insist on taking every technical term and re-using until it becomes devoid of any meaning?
GeekSleek
May 20, 2011 9:12 AM
I've so hated the term 'cloud' due to the above reasons and more. I almost throw up each time when those MS TVC's cam on and they said 'To the Cloud' and 'Yay Cloud'

Somehow anything stored on even a single drive on the internet has become cloud. You have hosts offering VPS clouds, yet it's 1 single box.

I wouldn't even include the likes of VMware/XenServer connected to 1 SAN as Cloud.

Be it SaaS Iaas etc, I wouldn't dream of it being called Cloud unless it's geographically dispersed and ALL content on a CDN type network.
realitybites
May 20, 2011 9:34 AM
I agree. I have a full virtual environment here, but I would/have never describe it to anyone as a cloud, even though it uses some of the basic tools to build a cloud.

What say we just blame "marketing" and call it a day :)
Ace
May 20, 2011 9:55 AM
I'm not sure about your point 3 Brett. When enterprises buy anything of scale, there is a process of credit approval and price negotiation before a 'purchase'. Self-service may follow once this has been settled, but buy-and-pay-by-credit-card-as-you-go model does not work with corporations paying 100-200K+ per month for cloud services. Hence the Fuj/IBM/Maq being not a match for the Amazon public cloud model.

Also, the fact these clouds are private does not mean they are not elastic, geographically dispersed and self-service oriented. It just means you will not get access to them unless you're of enterprise scale.
BrettWinterford
May 20, 2011 10:01 AM
Long before marketers (and journalists) got to the term, the industry had broadly agreed on the NIST definition of cloud computing.
http://groups.google.com/group/cloudforum/web/nist-working-definition-of-cloud-computing?pli=1
I wish we could have left it there.
djzort
May 20, 2011 10:28 AM
clouds dont have a silver lining, are made of vapor and tend to rain on your parade.

Graeme Harrison (prof at-symbol post.harvard.edu)
May 20, 2011 10:41 AM
The cloud is smoke when viewed through mirrors.
Denham
May 20, 2011 12:22 PM
If only it was that "simple"... I think the big dilemma here is the concept that the "cloud" should be easy to administer and configure - If it has a leaver I can pull then its a true cloud service (some reporters would have us believe). Anyone who has deployed applications will know that technology has many configurable components... some of which can be administered via self service some of which need deep understanding of the implications associated to change control. It is my opinion that marketers are doing an exceptional job of simplifying the 'go to market message' of what is often complex technical solutions to a business requirement.... after all what are the options? -(selling a box )only to have a client ask - "Can I access this over the Internet?" :)
pccoffee
May 21, 2011 6:39 AM
Good points, clearly made, quoted and further commented at http://cloudblog.salesforce.com/2011/05/jurassic-park-was-a-private-cloud.html

Regards and best wishes, pc
dawesi
Jun 2, 2011 10:28 PM
FYI: The reason why you have to 'manually' upgrade is for common sense reasons: MONEY - people don't like blowing their budget by 4000%, they'd prefer to be offline. (no seriously - big companies have said this)


You'd be surprised how many variations of what people want the cloud to be are out there and how they DEMAND to interface to it. I encountered at least 50 clear variations on what automatic and manual triggers should be present in systems when I was working for a cloud hosting company and designing their interface(s)as an integration architect.
dawesi
Jun 2, 2011 10:29 PM
And I'd never take the advice of a journo who's only been to press conferences and read marketing hype with no experience in implemenation to what 'cloud' is.

I'm with @Brett. Cloud has been long defined.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
Top Stories
Photos: Google I/O 2013
Evolution not revolution.
 
Photos: NextDC builds S1 data centre
Prepares for September launch.
 
QLD Govt contributed to payroll project 'death spiral'
Inquiry hears from independent expert.
 
 
Time for some clarity on vendor marketing claims.
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Do you prefer the Coalition's NBN policy?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 1605

Vote