Aussie traffic data on TomTom target list

 

Three years' worth to be auctioned.

GPS maker TomTom has admitted to collecting traffic data from every Australian user of its devices in the past three years.

The Australian Financial Review reported that anonymised Australian data would be packaged and auctioned later this year.

The company has already faced a backlash from users in the Netherlands for selling collated speed data to police, to inform the placement of speed cameras.

TomTom said last month that it had initially decided to collect motorist information to make journey duration predictions more accurate.

Electronic Frontiers Australia chair Colin Jacobs warned that companies' claims of aggregating and anonymising data “doesn’t always wash”.

“It’s not clear enough what’s happening and what they’re doing with the data,” he said.

“The data could be taken between a user’s home and workplace. How easy is it to anonymise?”

Jacobs added that it wasn’t in the interests of TomTom “to consider how a motivated party could link data back to a person”.

“And the harder they try to anonymise the data, the less value it has [to potential buyers],” he noted.

Jacobs was also critical of companies that included controversial terms of service with products.

He said that giving customers a choice between “agreeing to legalese or not using the device at all” was “not a fair way to present [the issue] to a user who’s just bought the device”.

“The terms and conditions might say they’re able to use the data [like TomTom did], but for practical purposes, I don’t think that’s a good way to treat customers."

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Aussie traffic data on TomTom target list
"@pameacs is right, and as well as the personal privacy aspect, there's another serious issue. It's already been stated that the politicians and police want these data so they can see where many ..."
By anonymous
 
 
 
Comments: 2
pameacs
May 7, 2011 8:20 AM
Unless they have a broad approach of trips say from Parramatta to City, of course without careful consideration there is a good chance of someone picking up patterns in the data. My question is to whom is this data of value if it is correctly anonomized(is that a word)? Does this mean becuase lots of people use Parramatta rd to get to work that we should have more billboards. Its like using patient data in surveys, if they have had a breast screening that patient is highly likely over 40 and female, so it doesn't take too much to start pulling other bits out until you have extracted a single patient from the data. Find a road trauma and go research papers for traffic accidents on that day and in the time frame and you have that patients entire history.
What I want to know is how many people have Tom Toms and didn't even know if they agreed to the collection of data from their device? I will guess all other manufacturers are doing the same so are they all coming clean?
anonymous
May 8, 2011 1:36 PM

@pameacs is right, and as well as the personal privacy aspect, there's another serious issue.

It's already been stated that the politicians and police want these data so they can see where many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. People (mostly) aren't stupid - they will only travel at a higher speed where road conditions favour doing that, ie, are safer.

So now the GPS datasets will be used to position revenue cameras in the SAFEST locations, where people tend to travel faster. This completely exposes the constantly repeated lie that revenue cameras are only placed at accident blackspots, as a road safety measure.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote