Perth firms phreaked by VoIP hackers

 

WA Police warns businesses to change passwords.

Western Australia Police has warned the state's businesses to change passwords and cap international calls on enterprise VoIP networks, after investigating several cases of scammers hacking the networks to commit fraud.

The WA Police said three businesses have reported their VoIP networks hacked by opportunists using the networks to make calls to international numbers offering premium voice services - often owned by the attacker.

In total, the three businesses were set to have suffered losses of some $70,000 from the attacks.

Similar methods were used in early 2009 in an attack that caused one small business to run up a $120,000 bill.

The WA Police Technology Crime Investigations Unit said that phone hacking or 'phreaking' occurs when hackers gain access to a company's VoIP PABX to make calls - usually overnight or on weekends when the calls can go unnoticed.

"Many businesses have only the most basic security in place such as factory default access pins or passwords and as such they are easy pickings for criminals," the WA Police said in a statement.

Senior Constable Paul Litherland of the Technology Crime Investigation Unit warned businesses to "remain extremely vigilant" to ensure attempts to attack their online telecommunications networks are unsuccessful, as the Police are relatively powerless to prevent the fraud.

"As these criminals are working overseas and using quite elaborate methods to avoid detection, Western Australia Police find it difficult to identify or prosecute the persons responsible," the law enforcement agency said in a statement.

Litherland said business owners should:

  • Change passwords and prefixes that cannot be easily guessed,
  • Place caps on the number of calls that can be made over any given period.
  • Bar calls to international locations the company does not contact.
  • Have systems in place to detect suspicious activity.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Perth firms phreaked by VoIP hackers
"We are seeing more and more IP PBX scanning and probing for vulnerabilities and yet there isn't a big take up yet of our IP PBX VoIP pentetration testing services. I think the SMB customers ..."
By BaysNet
 
 
 
Comments: 3
Yanni
Apr 12, 2011 5:47 PM
LOL Just proves how under skilled, the IT stuff are at the enterprise level.
pameacs
Apr 12, 2011 10:00 PM
It doesn't say anything about them being big business, I know a lot of smaller businesses 10 or 20 people are also installing VOIP systems to get access to calls for various reasons. Cheap interstate presence for example. These are the likely ones as they would be easy pickings for smart criminals. Most of those businesses have no IT presence and unfortunately rely on various unskilled sources to get a good price to do some of that work. I hope the guys that installed the PABX have good professional indemnity as this is a classic case for challenging. It probably wont happen as the installer was a golf buddy of the CEO or CFO.
BaysNet
Apr 13, 2011 8:38 AM
We are seeing more and more IP PBX scanning and probing for vulnerabilities and yet there isn't a big take up yet of our IP PBX VoIP pentetration testing services. I think the SMB customers attracted by the cost savings are not doing the due dilligence around the security of the IP PBX and their VoIP UC resellers are selling the service and avoiding the security value add as it weakens the pay pack proposition.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote