Twitter gets 20 years' good security bond

Powered by SC Magazine
 

Settles over security claim.

Twitter has been barred from overstating the extent to which it can securely manage user information for the next 20 years in a settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission.

The micro blogging site had been investigated over two hacking incidents in 2009 in which 55 accounts were hijacked, including US President Barack Obama’s.

The accounts were hijacked after someone hacked into Twitter’s support team administration tools, the company admitted after the incidents occurred.

The FTC alleged the attacks exposed non-public information and information that users had designated as private, such as private Tweets.

The regulator took exception to the wording of Twitter’s security claims in its original privacy policy, which said it employed “administrative, physical and electronic measures designed to protect your information from unauthorised access”.

Twitter's subsequent versions, which can be found here, make no claims about the level of security it provides. 

The FTC also ordered Twitter to establish and maintain a “comprehensive information security program”, which would be assessed biannually by an independent auditor for the next decade.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Twitter gets 20 years' good security bond
 
 
 
Top Stories
First look: Microsoft Outlook for iOS
[Update] Office productivity suite for iOS completed with Outlook.
 
NewSat defaults on $26m in overdue Lockheed payments
Jabiru-1 satellite build hits further hurdles.
 
IBM denies plans to cut 112k jobs
But admits to further restructuring.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  36%
 
Your insurance company
  5%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  9%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  8%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  4%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  18%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  7%
TOTAL VOTES: 3085

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?

   |   View results
I support shutting down the OAIC.
  27%
 
I DON'T support shutting the OAIC.
  73%
TOTAL VOTES: 982

Vote