Secret copyright treaty derails Australian Internet code

 

Local internet industry fears "another ACTA debacle".

A secret copyright treaty being hammered out behind closed doors by the nations in the region and rights holders threatens to derail an Australian internet industry code being written to deal with online piracy.

The Internet Industry of Australia was moved to write the code responding to rising intellectual property theft following the recent AFACT v iiNet ruling in the Federal Court.

But it was surprised to learn its efforts were at risk of being obsoleted by a secret draft treaty that has severe penalties for its disclosure.

The association's code of practice for internet intermediaries such as ISPs, search, hosting and social-media providers was "necessary and appropriate" for them to gain "certainty around their legal rights and obligations”, said IIA's outgoing chief Peter Coroneos.

Although the iiNet appeal provided guidance on intermediaries' responsibilities, it fell short on what reasonable steps they should take to respond to allegations of infringement levelled against their users.

The association's code will close this gap, Coroneos said. The IIA did not condone infringement but had identified market failure as the crux of the problem.

“If users have access to more and better content, when, where and in the form they choose to consume it, and at a realistic price, we're quite sure the motivation for infringement will decline,” he said.

Blindsided

But Coroneos was surprised to learn of the Trans Pacific Partnership agreement, which could be an obstacle to the code.

The partnership drew negotiators from the US, Australia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, Peru, Malaysia and Vietnam.

The leaked draft from the Santiago talks outlined extensive new powers for rights holders beyond those required by current law:

  • A new legal regime of ISP liability
  • ISPs to identify internet users
  • Established damages for the rights holder
  • Criminal enforcement for technological measures beyond WIPO internet treaties, even when there is not copyright infringement
  • Outlawing parallel trade in any copyrighted good
  • 95-year copyright minimum term for works for hire

“Now that this leak has surfaced we will be giving it close attention and seek consultations with [Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] in order to avoid a repeat of the ACTA debacle,” Coroneos said.

“We would hate to see another ACTA debacle emerge through this process.”

He said the leaks showed there were controversial issues around intermediary liability: “This is all the more reason why the IIA is seeking to establish greater clarity around where intermediary liabilities should begin and end”.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Secret copyright treaty derails Australian Internet code
"I feel so relieved to know we have a real "career" public servant looking after our interests at the UN; and involved with the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. Tim Yeend(BA) started out as a ..."
By BigAussie
 
 
 
Comments: 13
btone
Mar 11, 2011 3:52 PM
Why howdy pardners, y'all up fer a liddle ol' posse to git them thar wascally wustlers?

Aw hell, lets just throw out the Australian legal system and nominate for US statehood, sure would save a lot of those old fashioned ethical and legal wranglings, eh what?
meski
Mar 11, 2011 3:53 PM
Anyone got an email address or something we can write to to express objections to this agreement? Is it anywhere close to being legislated?
Oldsniper
Mar 11, 2011 4:37 PM
The Movie and music companies dont want to give their consumers to have a fair go. About time their started offering what the consumers want when and where we want it, and not the crap they want to shove down our throats.
They will never stop illegal downloading until they start giving the consumers what they want, at a price that is affordable.
pragmatic45
Mar 11, 2011 4:44 PM
FWIW I received a response from Foreign Affairs and Trade, the agency responsible for negotiating TPP:

"Australia does not comment on purportedly leaked documents, however current information about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement negotiations can be found on the DFAT website at http://www.dfat.gov.au/fta/tpp/index.html."
HubertCumberdale
Mar 11, 2011 5:53 PM
Secret copyright treaty leads to secret copyright infringements. News at 11.
kartsie
Mar 11, 2011 8:33 PM
95 years?? I'd be rotting in a grave well before the copyright on anything I ever made in my lifetime would expire!

Copyright is supposed to temporarily protect authors' interests, at the same time ensuring their work will be in public domain within reasonable time so that society can benefit from the work.

This proposed treaty, if true, will only protect the pockets of big companies still milking profit from ages-old products.
BigAussie
Mar 11, 2011 11:21 PM
@kartsie -- current Copyright laws in Australia for most creative works are already set at death of the creator + 70 years (courtesy of Disney trying to extend the life of Mickey Mouse -- hence often being referred to as the "Mickey Mouse Clause". You're right though; it only serves to line the pockets of the corporations who receive the bulk of the reward.

We (Australia) can't start complaining about these provisions now. There were pleny trying to spread the word about the original WIPO treaty prior to our Government signing it. No one gave a damn. Now it is well and truly too late.

Once this all goes through; the "powers that be" will have managed to wind the clocks back about 50 years; as far as copyright goes.

With so many eCommerce sites on the internet now, with many selling goods sourced from abroad; how does that fit in with the concept of grey importing. Are they really going to outlaw eBay and the new Chinese based Myer Online store....and even Hardly Normal if they ever get their online act together.

anonymous
Mar 12, 2011 1:27 PM

Who would have thought it? A secret international treaty being developed, by our govt among others, to impose more restrictions and penalties on our use of the Net.

Is this another example (like the recent refusal by govt officials to disclose details of mandatory ISP data retention) of politicians and bureaucrats keeping processes secret to prevent any public discussion prior to announcing what they have already decided to impose?

Once again it seems we may have the finest politicians that money can buy. . .


kartsie
Mar 12, 2011 5:50 PM
> Outlawing parallel trade in any copyrighted good

I've just realised what "parallel trade" means: grey market imports. So with this treaty we won't be able to circumvent the massively overpriced book prices in Australia.
alinos
Mar 12, 2011 11:46 PM
@oldsniper

Affordable price point isn't the main issue in my eyes

It's as you stated though content delivery, somehow in this day and age we still seem to rely on the snail mail equivilant when it comes to media.

I want to be able to buy Blu-Ray Quality Media, in a digital format, with unrestrictive DRM(So long as it works with a Media centre program of my choice). And i would be willing to pay more for that privilage.

I'd also like to be able to Prepurchase Access to an entire season of an ongoing TV series. Kind of like a subscription. And say 24 hours after it airs i can go and download and watch it legally, without adds. Not only would this show direct interest in a TV series. it offers a rival service to TVrip's, which i am guessing a large number of australian's take advantage of as our local TV stations are pathetic when it comes to airing things and if they do they don't air it in any sort of a timely matter. Yet if something Big happens in the show in america theres a good chance that either the internet or in somecase the news will spoil it if you haven't seen it within days of it airing.

The fact is that forcing me to wait to watch stuff 6 months later and making it illegal for me to import stuff from the US because the show hasn't been released here and therefore the DVD's are on an near indefinite hold. Isn't going to help the copyright holder's.

I'll Simply move onto another activity i can enjoy when i want to instead of when some bigwig has determined i can. I hear outside was a hoot 20 years ago maybe ill give that a go
Hyperion09
Mar 13, 2011 12:39 PM
"Outlawing parallel trade in any copyrighted good"

Well gee, maybe we wouldn't have to rely on imports if your prices weren't so massively bloated!
frogg11
Mar 13, 2011 1:21 PM
Go to http://www.dfat.gov.au/ and search for "Trans Pacific Partnership agreement".

"The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade continues to welcome public submissions and comments on Australia's participation in TPP negotiations. Submissions may be emailed to tpp@dfat.gov.au."

Everyone send your objections NOW before it is too late!
BigAussie
Mar 23, 2011 6:15 PM
I feel so relieved to know we have a real "career" public servant looking after our interests at the UN; and involved with the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.

Tim Yeend(BA) started out as a representative with the UN Trade and Development group in 2004. Not too shaby; 6 years later posted to Geneva in Switzerland as chief. He is our lead negotiator in all things WIPO. Really tough looking bloke too :p

Explains why we are being led around by the Europeans and told where to sign on the dotted line.

Banning of grey imports will only line the pockets of those businesses in Oz who were first in and locked down their little piece of the import cake.

Anyone new to market who might dare to contact a manufacturer direct and take a gamble on importing 10 times the quantity of an existing importer to get a better buying price; will no longer be able to do that (think JB HiFi or WoW) after this secret agreement becomes law. Watch pricing rise back to pre-21st century levels.

@Alinos
The suppliers of TV shows especially are being held to ransom by the Networks in Oz. In USA where Hulu and NetFlix are doing a roaring trade selling access to TV shows from $10/month -- we are locked out, because of the "agreements" with the TV networks here. One channel in particular has a terrible record of showing episodes out of order and chopping seasons in half to satisfy some warped desire to piss off followers of a series.

Hopefully bigger players in the IP TV market are able to cause market disruption and open up the market. Google TV and Apple TV to start with would be nice.

Don't hold your breath waiting for enough bandwidth in Oz to stream Blue-ray quality just yet. The NBN whenever it goes past your door will be able to handle the size of a blue-ray stream; but if too many of your neighbours also start watching blue-ray streams --- the pipes aren't going to be big enough. C'est la vie.



Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote