Suspended sentence for Adelaide hacker

 

Urged to take a job in IT security.

An Adelaide man has been handed a suspended sentence after pleading guilty to computer hacking offences, with the District Court judge urging the young man to put his skills to use in the IT security industry.

Twenty-year old Anthony Scott Harrison pleaded guilty in July 2010 to seven charges relating to the creation of a virus several years earlier that infected some 3000 computers worldwide, according to court reporters for Adelaide Now.

Harrison had used the virus to view credit card information, which was later used to funnel funds from victim's bank accounts into his own.

In pushing for a lighter sentence, Harrison's defence team had argued that their client was willing to use his skills legitimately in the IT security industry.

District Court judge Paul Rice handed Harrison a two year and eight month suspended sentence, predicated on three years of good behaviour.

Rice noted that Harrison had been an unemployed, bored teenager that was "obsessed with computers" at the time of the offence.

"You are obviously very skilled with the use of computers and you should endeavour to put those skills to use in a legal way," the judge reportedly said.

The judge was far from impressed, however, that Harrison had opted to sell his hacking tools on the internet for other hackers to exploit.

In December, Judge Rice had reportedly noted that there was little precedent to rely on to formulate a sentence for the crime.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Suspended sentence for Adelaide hacker
"1.) Remove the judge, District Court judge Paul Rice, send him back to kindergarten, he's definitely in need of education, then again I'd say it's a close call to throwing the fool in jail for ..."
By X_Selectar
 
 
 
Comments: 3
M1-A2
Jan 14, 2011 4:14 PM
What is it about the Internet that makes judges think that there is no precedent for sentencing? I appreciate that judges don't understand technology most of the time but here is a tip, there is almost an exact comparison in the real world for everything that happens on the net. This guy used the net and a virus to obtain unto 3000 credit cards. How is this different from someone skimming 3000 credit cards in a shop or pub? Okay, so the net made it easier, but impact was the same, 3000 credit card numbers were stolen. Surely there is precedent in Australian law for that. What about the ATM skimming cases in 4 states last year? Like using the virus to minipulate the computer, the ATM skimmers manipulated the ATM to skim cards and view PINs. There is no real difference.

Oh, and I will not be hiring this guy. Computer security is about being ethical at all times. If boredom is the excuse for hacking then I don't want this guy near any of my IT, period, least of all with elevated admin rights. This is not a case, however, for licensing by the ACS.
Ezy2Confuze
Jan 14, 2011 4:44 PM
As M1-A2 says, I cannot see this guy being hired any time soon in IT Security. At least with people like Kevin Mitnick, they did it more for curiosity, whereas this guy did it purely for money.

How can anyone possibly trust an IT person with HR records, financial records data etc with that sort of history?

It also seems the Judge didn't take into account the financial ramifications to the banks that had to reverse transactions etc because of his thievery. Basic common sense would say this is a case of fraud first and foremost, so base your judgement on previous cases of financial fraud.
X_Selectar
Jan 14, 2011 7:32 PM
1.) Remove the judge, District Court judge Paul Rice, send him back to kindergarten, he's definitely in need of education, then again I'd say it's a close call to throwing the fool in jail for incompetence.Judges are there to create precedents within law, this guy is a sad indicator of any legal system anywhere.
2.)Twenty-year old Anthony Scott Harrison needs at least five years in jail, without access to a computer, for stealing and robbing funds from bank accounts. Plus offering tools for others to perpetuate such acts.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australia turns to homegrown drones
Debating the finer points of unmanned aerial vehicle design.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  20%
 
No
  80%
TOTAL VOTES: 521

Vote