Intel chips in US$1.5bn to NVIDIA peace fund

 

"Preserves patent peace".

Intel and Chinese GPU maker NVIDIA yesterday struck a cross patent settlement under which Intel agreed to fork out US$1.5 billion to maintain "patent peace".

The settlement ends a long-running legal battle in which Intel was accused of barring NVIDIA from integrating its GPUs with Intel's new Nehalem line of chips.

Intel will pay the figure over five years and gain access to NVIDIA's full range of patents, while NVIDIA will be licensed to use some of Intel's patents, excluding its proprietary processors, flash memory and some undisclosed Intel chipsets.

"This agreement ends the legal dispute between the companies, preserves patent peace and provides protections that allow for continued freedom in product design," said Doug Melamed, Intel senior vice president and general counsel.

"Our cross license with Intel reflects the substantial value of our visual and parallel computing technologies. It also underscores the importance of our inventions to the future of personal computing, as well as the expanding markets for mobile and cloud computing," said Jen-Hsun Huang, NVIDIA's president and chief executive officer.

Rivalry between the two has heated up in recent years with NVIDIA's parallel processing GPUs now running several of the world's most powerful supercomputers, while also becoming an increasingly important differentiator in desktop and laptop computers.

Copyright © iTnews.com.au . All rights reserved.


Intel chips in US$1.5bn to NVIDIA peace fund
 
 
 
Top Stories
Beyond ACORN: Cracking the infosec skills nut
[Blog post] Could the Government's cybercrime focus be a catalyst for change?
 
The iTnews Benchmark Awards
Meet the best of the best.
 
Telstra hands over copper, HFC in new $11bn NBN deal
Value of 2011 deal remains intact.
 
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...
Latest Comments
Polls
Who do you trust most to protect your private data?







   |   View results
Your bank
  39%
 
Your insurance company
  3%
 
A technology company (Google, Facebook et al)
  8%
 
Your telco, ISP or utility
  7%
 
A retailer (Coles, Woolworths et al)
  2%
 
A Federal Government agency (ATO, Centrelink etc)
  20%
 
An Australian law enforcement agency (AFP, ASIO et al)
  14%
 
A State Government agency (Health dept, etc)
  6%
TOTAL VOTES: 1802

Vote
Do you support the abolition of the Office of the Information Commissioner?