US Air Force blocks NYT, Guardian over WikiLeaks

 

Access to classified material not allowed.

The US Air Force has blocked employees from visiting media websites carrying leaked WikiLeaks documents, including The New York Times and the Guardian, a spokesman said on Tuesday.

Major Toni Tones, a spokeswoman at Air Force Space Command in Colorado, said the command had blocked employees whose computers are connected to the Air Force network from accessing at least 25 websites that have posted WikiLeaks documents.

The Air Force "routinely blocks Air Force network access to websites hosting inappropriate materials or malware (malicious software) and this includes any website that hosts classified materials and those that are released by WikiLeaks," she said.

The Air Force move comes as the U.S. government seeks to minimize the damage from WikiLeaks' release of 250,000 State Department cables through media outlets and on its own website.

The cables released last month, which reveal blunt, sometimes derisive depictions of foreign governments and leaders, have been an embarrassment for Washington.

Past releases this year by WikiLeaks contained sensitive information about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Washington said compromised national security and put people at risk.

The Pentagon had already prohibited its employees from viewing WikiLeaks documents online, no matter how widely they are published, but it has not blocked access to websites that post leaked cables.

Pentagon officials have instructed employees they "shouldn't access the WikiLeaks site because the information there is still considered classified," said Colonel David Lapan, a Pentagon spokesman.

(Reporting by Missy Ryan; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

Copyright Reuters Copyright Reuters. Click for restrictions.



US Air Force blocks NYT, Guardian over WikiLeaks
"Now back to that actual article, which is about Air Force employees accessing Wikileaks material, and nothing to do with people "getting into their system". I'm pretty sure it will NOT be at all ..."
By Sams
 
 
 
Comments: 6
btone
Dec 15, 2010 3:59 PM
Well, that should work...

...shut the door after the horse has bolted, with a door made of tissue paper.
pameacs
Dec 16, 2010 8:33 AM
And everyone is not going home and having a look from there, Hmmm!!! It shows how inadequate many organizations policies are in dealing with many Cyber Security issues.

Ace
Dec 17, 2010 1:58 PM
Yes @btone, but they slammed it shut. Whenever my sister did that (many years ago), the rest of us stayed well clear. There was a message in that slam!
Tom Brown
Dec 17, 2010 4:07 PM
Hi Ace, does this mean they really are upset? Must be something for them to feel so guilty about!
Maxxi2
Dec 20, 2010 1:21 PM
Anyone thinking their "slam" does not have some weight behind it should see how they go getting into their system today...

Good luck and write often if they allow you pen and paper...

They may be sloppy at many many things, agreed, but once they have political bullants all over their collective *rses you can be assured that thei focus will be pretty effective for a couple of years...

btone, I would not try the resilience of that tissue paper for quite a while if I was you... >;))
Sams
Dec 20, 2010 4:20 PM
Now back to that actual article, which is about Air Force employees accessing Wikileaks material, and nothing to do with people "getting into their system". I'm pretty sure it will NOT be at all effective given the growing thousands of Wikileaks mirror, and the massive replication of material all over the web and P2P.
Comments have been disabled for this article.
 
 
 
Top Stories
Australian miners send drones to work
In-depth: Unmanned aerial vehicles in the resources sector.
 
The New Zealand telco problem
Opinion: Could Telstra save Kiwi telcos?
 
IT price probe to 'name and shame' gougers
Industry ducking the issue, committee claims.
 
Sign up to receive iTnews email bulletins
   FOLLOW US...

Latest VideosSee all videos »

Latest Comments
Polls
Should the Government enact new legislation to protect copyright holders in the digital age?

   |   View results
Yes
  19%
 
No
  81%
TOTAL VOTES: 510

Vote